Maeda et al v. BAUSMAN et al
| Michael Maeda and Djan Nai Thong |
| David Pekoske, Tracy Renaud and KATHLEEN BAUSMAN |
| 2:2021cv01082 |
| March 5, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| TIMOTHY J SAVAGE |
| Immigration: Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Acceptance of Service by U.S. Attorney Re: accepted summons and complaint on behalf of the United States Attorney (only). (va, ) |
Filing 2
ORDER THAT THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE ASSIGNED TO THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED CASE IS THE HONORABLE DAVID R. STRAWBRIDGE.. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE DAVID R. STRAWBRIDGE ON 3/11/21. 3/12/21 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (va, )
|
| Summons Issued as to KATHLEEN BAUSMAN, David Pekoske, Tracy Renaud, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General E-MAILED To: COUNSEL on 3/8/21. SUMMONS E-MAILED AS TO AUSA ON 3/8/21. (bw, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against KATHLEEN BAUSMAN, David Pekoske, Tracy Renaud ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0313-14963105.), filed by Michael Maeda. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Designation Form Designation Form, #3 Case Management Track Form Case Management Track Form)(HENRY, MICHAEL) (Attachment 2 replaced on 3/11/2021) (md, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
