WALKER v. TICE et al
KHALIL WALKER |
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, JOSH SHAPIRO, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LARRY KRASNER and SUPERINTENDENT TICE |
2:2021cv01172 |
March 9, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
PETRESE B TUCKER |
Habeas Corpus: (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Letter dated 4/28/21 Re: Status Update (Attachments: #1 Docket Sheet)(sbt, ) |
Filing 5 Letter dated 4/23/21 by KHALIL WALKER (sbt, ) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ELECTION, by KHALIL WALKER. Envelope. (va, ) |
Filing 3 ORDER THAT PETITION FILED BY WALKER DOES NOT CONTAIN THE INSTRUCTIONS THAT ARE CONTAINED IN OUR STANDARD FORM AS OUTLINED HEREIN., ETC. WALKER IS DIRECTED WITHIN 30 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER TO COMPLETE AND RETURN THE NOTICE OF ELECTION FORM ATTACHED TO THIS ORDER INDICATING HIS ELECTION TO EITHER (1) WITHDRAW HIS CURRENT PETITION (2) HAVE THE PETITION CONSTRUED AND RULED ON UNDER 28 USC 2254, ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PETRESE B. TUCKER ON 3/30/21. 3/30/21 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO WALKER.(rf, ) |
COPY OF DOC. NO. 3 HAS BEEN MAILED TO PRO SE, WALKER. (bw, ) |
PRO SE GUIDELINES #2 MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER. (jpd, ) |
Filing 2 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (bw, ) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by KHALIL WALKER. (NO FEE PAID; NO IFP FILED) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(bw, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.