DHAS v. NATIONAL CREDIT SYSTEMS INC
| MADHUKAR DHAS |
| NATIONAL CREDIT SYSTEMS INC and NCSPLUS, INC. |
| 2:2021cv01386 |
| March 23, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| CYNTHIA M RUFE |
| Other Statutes: Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER #4 MAILED TO UNREP. (fdc)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER THAT THIS ACTION IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. THE CLERK IS DIRECTED TO CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 5/3/21. 5/4/21 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO UNREP AND E-MAILED.(mbh, )
|
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by MADHUKAR DHAS re: sharon mccabe villa served Summons and Complaint upon NCSPLUS, INC. by personal. NCSPLUS, INC. served on 4/5/2021, answer due 4/26/2021. (COCCO, ROBERT) |
| Summons Issued as to NCSPLUS, INC.. E-MAILED To: COUNSEL on 3/31/21 (bw, ) |
| Filing 2 AMENDED COMPLAINT against NCSPLUS, INC., filed by MADHUKAR DHAS.(COCCO, ROBERT) |
| Summons Issued as to NATIONAL CREDIT SYSTEMS INC. E-mailed to counsel on 3/14/21 (mbh, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against NATIONAL CREDIT SYSTEMS INC ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0313-15003256.), filed by MADHUKAR DHAS. (Attachments: #1 Designation Form, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(COCCO, ROBERT) Modified on 3/23/2021 (fb). |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by MADHUKAR DHAS. (fb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
