TAT FRANCHISES, LLC et al v. CUMBERLAND BEAD BOYS, INC. et al
| TIME AFTER TIME ENTERPRISES, LLC and TAT FRANCHISES, LLC |
| ROBERT E. BURNESS, DANIEL W BROWN and CUMBERLAND BEAD BOYS, INC. |
| 2:2021cv01448 |
| March 26, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| CYNTHIA M RUFE |
| Property Rights: Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1051 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Settlement Request to Mark Case as Settled Pursuant to Local Rule 41.1(b) filed by TAT FRANCHISES, LLC, TIME AFTER TIME ENTERPRISES, LLC..(TRACTENBERG, CRAIG) |
| Filing 2 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by TAT FRANCHISES, LLC, TIME AFTER TIME ENTERPRISES, LLC. ROBERT E. BURNESS waiver sent on 3/29/2021, answer due 5/28/2021; CUMBERLAND BEAD BOYS, INC. waiver sent on 3/29/2021, answer due 5/28/2021. (TRACTENBERG, CRAIG) |
| Summons Issued as to DANIEL W BROWN, ROBERT E. BURNESS, CUMBERLAND BEAD BOYS, INC.. E-MAILED To: COUNSEL on 3/29/21 (bw, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0313-15013110.), filed by TAT FRANCHISES, LLC, TIME AFTER TIME ENTERPRISES, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Designation Form, #3 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT, #4 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT)(TRACTENBERG, CRAIG) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
