MCCURDY v. PIAZZA MAZDA et al
Plaintiff: JOHN MCCURDY
Defendant: PIAZZA MAZDA and RICK ROWE
Case Number: 2:2021cv01573
Filed: April 2, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: CHAD F KENNEY
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDERED THAT IF MCCURDY SEEKS TO PROCEED WITH THIS CASE, HE MUST SIGN HIS MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (ECF NO. 7) AND RETURN IT TO THE COURT WITHIN TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER; THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO PROVIDE A COPY OF THE UNSIGNED MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (ECF NO. 7) TO MCCURDY; THE CLERK OF COURT ALSO IS DIRECTED TO PROVIDE MCCURDY WITH A BLANK COPY OF THE COURTS FORM COMPLAINT FOR USE IN EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION CASES BEARING THE ABOVE CAPTIONED CIVIL ACTION NUMBER. MCCURDY MAY USE THIS FORM TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT IF HE CHOOSES TO DO SO.2 4. IF MCCURDY SEEKS TO PROCEED BY WAY OF AN AMENDED COMPLAINT IN THIS COURT, HE MUST, WITHIN TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT THAT COMPLIES WITH FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 8 AND 10.3 ANY AMENDED COMPLAINT MUST IDENTIFY ALL DEFENDANTS IN THE CAPTION OF THE AMENDED COMPLAINT IN ADDITION TO IDENTIFYING THEM IN THE BODY OF THE AMENDED COMPLAINT, AND SHALL STATE THE BASIS FOR MCCURDYS CLAIMS AGAINST EACH DEFENDANT. THE AMENDED COMPLAINT SHALL BE A COMPLETE DOCUMENT THAT DOES NOT RELY ON THE INITIAL COMPLAINT OR OTHER PAPERS FILED IN THIS CASE TO STATE A CLAIM AS OUTLINED HEREIN. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CHAD F. KENNEY ON 5/13/21. 5/13/21 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED WITH ECF ENTRIES #1 #7 .(jaa, )
May 6, 2021 Filing 7 APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN DISTRICT COURT WITHOUT PREPAYING FEES OR COSTS filed by JOHN MCCURDY. (Attachments: #1 EMAIL)(jaa, )
April 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDERED THAT IF MCCURDY SEEKS TO PROCEED WITH THIS CASE, HE MUST, WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, EITHER (1) PAY $402 (COMPRISING THE $350 FILING FEE AND $52 ADMINISTRATIVE FEE) TO THE CLERK OF COURT, OR (2) FILE A MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS; THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO PROVIDE MCCURDY WITH AN APPROPRIATE NONPRISONER APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, BEARING THE CIVIL ACTION NUMBER OF THIS CASE. MCCURDY MAY USE THIS FORM TO SEEK LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IF HE CANNOT AFFORD TO PAY THE FEES TO COMMENCE THIS CASE; AS IS APPEARS THAT MCCURDY IS ATTEMPTING TO PURSUE AN EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION CLAIM, THE CLERK OF COURT ALSO IS DIRECTED TO PROVIDE MCCURDY WITH A BLANK COPY OF THE COURTS FORM COMPLAINT FOR USE IN EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION CASES BEARING THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED CIVIL ACTION NUMBER. MCCURDY MAY USE THIS FORM TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT IF HE CHOOSES TO DO SO; IF MCCURDY SEEKS TO PROCEED BY WAY OF AN AMENDED COMPLAINT IN THIS COURT, HE MUST, WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT THAT COMPLIES WITH FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 8 AND 10.3 ANY AMENDED COMPLAINT MUST IDENTIFY ALL DEFENDANTS IN THE CAPTION OF THE AMENDED COMPLAINT IN ADDITION TO IDENTIFYING THEM IN THE BODY OF THE AMENDED COMPLAINT, AND SHALL STATE THE BASIS FOR MCCURDYS CLAIMS AGAINST EACH DEFENDANT. THE AMENDED COMPLAINT SHALL BE A COMPLETE DOCUMENT THAT DOES NOT RELY ON THE INITIAL COMPLAINT OR OTHER PAPERS FILED IN THIS CASE TO STATE A CLAIM AND IF MCCURDY DOES NOT ELECT TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT, MCCURDY NONETHELESS HAS FAILED TO SIGN HIS COMPLAINT AS REQUIRED BY FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 11 AS OUTLINED HEREIN. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CHAD F. KENNEY ON 4/7/21. 4/7/21 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(jaa, )
April 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDERED THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE ASSIGNED TO THE ABOVE CAPTIONED CASE IS THE HONORABLE LYNNE A. SITARSKI. SIGNED BY CLERK OF COURT KATE BARKMAN, CLERK OF COURT ON 4/6/21. 4/7/21 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(jaa, )
April 4, 2021 Filing 4 REQUEST by JOHN MCCURDY FOR APPOINTMENT OF ATTORNEY. (Attachments: #1 EMAIL ATTACHMENT)(JL )
April 3, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE by JOHN MCCURDY (Attachments: #1 EXHIBIT, #2 EMAIL ATTACHMENT)(JL )
April 2, 2021 Filing 2 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (bw, )
April 2, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against PIAZZA MAZDA, RICK ROWE, filed by JOHN MCCURDY. (NO FEE PAID; NO IFP FILED) (Attachments: #1 E-MAIL)(bw, )
April 2, 2021 APPLICATION FOR IFP/REQUEST FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL/COMPLAINT FORM(S) HAVE BEEN E-MAILED TO PRO SE, MCCURDY. (bw, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MCCURDY v. PIAZZA MAZDA et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JOHN MCCURDY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PIAZZA MAZDA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RICK ROWE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?