LEWIS-BEY v. SMART et al
Plaintiff: TYRONE LEWIS-BEY
Defendant: SMART and SARPONG
Case Number: 2:2021cv01578
Filed: April 5, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: JOEL H SLOMSKY
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 27, 2021 DOCS # 6 & 7 ALONG WITH 1983 COMPLAINT PACKAGE SENT TO LEWIS-BEY (rf, )
May 26, 2021 Filing 7 MEMORANDUM ORDER THAT LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED. THE COMPLAINT IS DEEMED FILED. THE COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. LEWIS-BAY MAY FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER AS OUTLINED HEREIN. UPON THE FILING OF AN AMENDED COMPLAINT, THE CLERK SHALL NOT MAKE SERVICE UNTIL SO ORDERED BY THE COURT. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO SEND LEWIS-BEY A BLANK COPY OF THIS COURT'S CURRENT STANDARD COMPLAINT FORM, ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 5/26/21. 5/26/21 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PRO SE.(amas, )
May 26, 2021 Filing 6 MEMORANDUM. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 5/26/21. 5/26/21 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PRO SE.(amas, )
April 19, 2021 Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by TYRONE LEWIS-BEY.(amas, )
April 13, 2021 COPY OF DOC. NO. 4, IFP AND COMPLAINT FORM(S) HAVE BEEN MAILED TO PRO SE, LEWIS-BEY. (bw, )
April 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER THAT LEWIS-BEY'S MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO TO SEND TO LEWIS-BEY AN APPROPRIATE NON-PRISONER APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. IF LEWIS-BEY SEEKS TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS HE SHALL WITHIN 30 DAYS COMPLETE THE FORM. ALTERNATIVELY, LEWIS-BEY MAY PROCEED WITH THIS CASE BY PAYING $402 TO THE CLERK OF COURT WITHIN 30 DAYS. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO SEND TO LEWIS-BEY A BLANK COPY OF THIS COURTS FORM COMPLAINT. LEWIS-BEY MAY USE THIS FORM TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHIN 30 DAYS. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL NOT ISSUE SUMMONS UNTIL SO OREDERED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 4/12/21.4/13/21 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PRO SE.(amas, )
April 7, 2021 PLEADING #3 MAILED TO THE PRO SE (JL )
April 5, 2021 Filing 3 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (bw, )
April 5, 2021 Filing 2 COMPLAINT against SARPONG, SMART, filed by TYRONE LEWIS-BEY.(bw, )
April 5, 2021 Filing 1 APPLICATION to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by TYRONE LEWIS-BEY..(bw, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: LEWIS-BEY v. SMART et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SMART
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SARPONG
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: TYRONE LEWIS-BEY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?