CANNON v. SAUL
| ELISE CANNON |
| Comm'r of Soc. ANDREW M. SAUL and ANDREW M. SAUL |
| 2:2021cv01583 |
| April 2, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| CAROL SANDRA MOORE WELLS |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Procedural Order 4/6/21 Entered and e-mailed. (Attachments: #1 Supplemental Procedural Order)(fdc) |
Filing 5
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S #2 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED. THE COMPLAINT IS DEEMED FILED. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL ISSUE SUMMONS. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE CAROL SANDRA MOORE WELLS ON 4/6/21.4/6/21 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc)
|
| Summons issued electronically as to Commissioner of Social Security pursuant to Acceptance of Service Agreement dated July 6, 2020. (fdc, ) |
| Filing 4 Social Security Magistrate Consent by ELISE CANNON.. (CHERMOL, DAVID) |
| Filing 3 Social Security Notice of Case Assignment (Attachments: #1 CONSENT)(bw, ) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by ELISE CANNON..(CHERMOL, DAVID) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ANDREW M. SAUL, filed by ELISE CANNON. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Designation Form, #3 Case Management Track Form)(CHERMOL, DAVID) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
