DINGMAN v. SAUL et al
Plaintiff: CHARLES LUCAS DINGMAN
Defendant: ANDREW SAUL and SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Case Number: 2:2021cv01946
Filed: April 28, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: ELIZABETH T HEY
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Social Security Magistrate Consent by CHARLES LUCAS DINGMAN.. (SUTTON, THOMAS)
April 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Social Security Magistrate Consent by CHARLES LUCAS DINGMAN.. (SUTTON, THOMAS) Modified on 5/10/2021 (afm, ).(ATTORNEY REFILED COMPLETED FORM SEE #7
April 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Procedural Order 4/28/21 Entered and copies e-mailed. (Attachments: #1 Supplemental Procedural Order)(mbh, )
April 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER THAT LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED. THE COMPLAINT IS DEEMED FILED. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL ISSUE SUMMONSES. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL SERVE THE SUMMONSES AND THE COMPLAINT IN ACCORDANCE WITH FRCP 4(i) BY ELECTRONIC MEANS VIA THE COURT'S CASE MANAGEMENT/ELECTRONIC CASE FILES SYSTEM ("CM/ECF") UPON: THE OFFICE OF THE REGIONAL CHIEF COUNSEL, REGION III, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION; THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA AND THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL. THE CLERK'S OFFICE WILL ENSURE THAT CM/ECF NOTIFICATIONS INDICATING THAT THE COMPLAINT HAS BEEN FI;ED AND SUMMONSES HAVE BEEN ISSUED ARE SENT TO ogc.edpa.complaints@ssa.gov and USAPAE.SSAComplaints@usdoj.gov. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH T. HEY ON 4/28/21.4/28/21 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh, )
April 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Social Security Notice of Case Assignment (Attachments: #1 SS Consent)(mbh, )
April 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 First MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by CHARLES LUCAS DINGMAN..(SUTTON, THOMAS)
April 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ANDREW SAUL, filed by CHARLES LUCAS DINGMAN. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Designation Form, #3 Case Management Track Form)(SUTTON, THOMAS)
April 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Summons issued electronically as to Commissioner of Social Security pursuant to Acceptance of Service Agreement dated July 6, 2020. (mbh, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: DINGMAN v. SAUL et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ANDREW SAUL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CHARLES LUCAS DINGMAN
Represented By: THOMAS D. SUTTON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?