ATAMIAN et al v. Blinken et al
| Houri MASRELIAN, Rafi ATAMIAN and Berge ATAM |
| Sarin ATAM |
| WILLIAM M. MCSWAIN, MERRICK B. GARLAND, Anthony Blinken, ASST SEC CONS AFFRS CARL C. RISCH, JOHN DOE, CONN SCHRADER, LYNNE M. TRACY, CARL C. RISCH, LYNNE TRACY and MERRICK GARLAND |
| 2:2021cv01986 |
| April 29, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| MARK A KEARNEY |
| Prisoner Petitions: Mandamus & Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Acceptance of Service by U.S. Attorney Re: accepted summons and complaint on behalf of the United States Attorney (only). (mbh, ) |
| Summons Issued as to ANTHONY BLINKEN, JOHN DOE, MERRICK GARLAND, WILLIAM M. MCSWAIN, CARL C. RISCH, CONN SCHRADER, LYNNE TRACY, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General E-MAILED To: COUNSEL on 4/30/21. SUMMONS E-MAILED AS TO AUSA ON 4/30/21. (bw, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Anthony Blinken, JOHN DOE, MERRICK B. GARLAND, WILLIAM M. MCSWAIN, CARL C. RISCH, CONN SCHRADER, LYNNE M. TRACY ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0313-15088102.), filed by Houri MASRELIAN, Berge ATAM, Sarin ATAM. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Designation Form, #3 Case Management Track Form, #4 Exhibit, #5 Supplement Attorney Cover Sheet)(VOSBIKIAN, STEVEN) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
