Kinard v. BRITTAIN et al
Petitioner: Idris Kinard
Respondent: SCI FRACKVILLE and KATHY BRITTAIN
Case Number: 2:2021cv01992
Filed: April 30, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: JOSEPH F LEESON
Referring Judge: RICHARD A LLORET
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus: (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 RECEIPT OF STATE COURT RECORD. (sg, )
June 10, 2021 Opinion or Order State Court Record received 6/10/21 from C.C.P. Phila., and forwarded to the chambers of Magistrate Judge Lloret. (jpd)
June 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER THAT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PREVIOUSLY-ENTERED SCHEDULING ORDER, THE PHILADELPHIA COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE SHALL FILE A SPECIFIC AND DETAILED ANSWER TO THE CLAIMS IN MR. KINARDS HABEAS PETITION AND A SUPPORTING LEGAL MEMORANDUM ON OR BEFORE JULY 2, 2021. THE CLERK FOR THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK OF THIS COURT COPIES OF ALL RECORDS, INCLUDING TRANSCRIPTS OF NOTES OF TESTIMONY AT ARRAIGNMENT, TRIAL, SENTENCING, SUPPRESSION HEARINGS, POST-CONVICTION HEARINGS, PETITIONS, PLEADINGS, OPINIONS, AND BRIEFS OF STATE COURT PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF COMMONWEALTH V. KINARD, COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, CP-51-CR-0002209-2010, ON OR BEFORE JULY 2, 2021. AS REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. 3771(B)(2), THE COMMONWEALTH SHALL ENSURE THAT IN A FEDERAL HABEAS CORPUS PROCEEDING ARISING OUT OF A STATE CONVICTION, ANY CRIME VICTIMS ARE AFFORDED THEIR RIGHTS UNDER THE CRIME VICTIMS ACT, AS AMENDED JULY 27, 2006. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE RICHARD A. LLORET ON 6/7/21. 6/8/21 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (va, )
June 8, 2021 Opinion or Order COPY OF #5 ORDER FAXED TO CCP PHILADELPHIA COUNTY ON 6/8/21. (va, )
June 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Response regarding timeliness of habeas petition by KATHY BRITTAIN, SCI FRACKVILLE. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Direct appeal docket sheet, #2 Exhibit PCRA appeal docket sheet, #3 Exhibit Trial court docket sheet, #4 Exhibit Trial court opinion, #5 Exhibit Superior Court Opinion - Direct Appeal, #6 Exhibit PCRA court opinion, #7 Exhibit Superior Court Opinion - PCRA) (NAPIORSKI, DAVID)
May 18, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER THAT THE PHILADELPHIA COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SHALL ENTER THEIR APPEARANCE ON BEHALF OF THE REPONDENTS UPON RECEIPT OF THIS ORDER. THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY SHALL FILE A MEMORANDUM BY 6/7/21 EXPLAINING WHETHER THIS PETITION SHOULD BE DISMISSED AS UNTIMELY. THE CLERK FOR THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNY SHALL FILE WITH THIS CLERK OF THIS COURT ALL RECORDS ETC IN THE MATTER OF COMMONWEALTH v. KINARD CP-51-CR-0002209-2010 WITHIN 45 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE RICHARD A. LLORET ON 5/17/21. 5/19/21 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh, )
May 18, 2021 Opinion or Order Habeas petition, order (ECF #3) and docket emailed to Philadelphia County District Attorney's office. Order (ECF #3) forwarded to Phila County CCP (mbh, )
May 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER THAT THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED CASE IS REFERRED TO THE HONORABLE RICHARD A. LLORET, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, FOR A REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. PURSUANT TO LOCAL CIVIL RULE 72.1.IV(C), ALL ISSUES AND EVIDENCE SHALL BE PRESENTED TO THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, AND NEW ISSUES AND EVIDENCE SHALL NOT BE RAISED AFTER THE FILING OF THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IF THEY COULD HAVE BEEN PRESENTED TO THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL PROVIDE THE PHILADELPHIA COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE AND THE PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL WITH A COPY OF THE PETITION. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO CORRECT THE CAUSE LISTED ON THE DOCKET FROM 28 U.S.C. 1651 TO 28 U.S.C. 2254, PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS (STATE). SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR ON 5/17/21. 5/17/21 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (er, ) (Main Document 2 replaced on 5/17/2021) (er, ).
May 17, 2021 Opinion or Order E-mailed Order, Petition and Copy of docket to DA of Philadelphia County and PA Attorney General's Office (er, )
April 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number 0313-15088956.), filed by Idris Kinard. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet civil cover sheet, #2 Designation Form designation form)(HIMEBAUGH, TERI)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kinard v. BRITTAIN et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Idris Kinard
Represented By: TERI B. HIMEBAUGH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: SCI FRACKVILLE
Represented By: DAVID NAPIORSKI
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: KATHY BRITTAIN
Represented By: DAVID NAPIORSKI
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?