ROGERS v. DOLLAR GENERAL STORE $14849 et al
| DANIELLE ROGERS |
| DOLLAR GENERAL STORE $14849, DOLLAR GENERAL CORPORATION and DOLLAR GENERAL STORE #14849 |
| 2:2021cv02019 |
| April 30, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| PETRESE B TUCKER |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint and Separate Defenses by DOLLAR GENERAL CORPORATION, DOLLAR GENERAL STORE #14849.(PISANO, MATTHEW) |
Filing 4
ORDER THAT THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE ASSIGNED TO THE ABOVE CAPTIONED CASE IS THE HONORABLE CAROL SANDRA MOORE WELLS; ETC.. SIGNED BY CLERK OF COURT KATE BARKMAN, CLERK OF COURT ON 5/24/21. 5/24/21 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(JL )
|
| Filing 3 Original Record together with certified copy of docket entries received from Court of Common Pleas of DELAWARE County. (JL ) |
| Filing 2 Disclosure Statement Form pursuant to FRCP 7.1 by DOLLAR GENERAL CORPORATION.(PISANO, MATTHEW) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by DOLLAR GENERAL CORPORATION (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0313-15090986), filed by DOLLAR GENERAL CORPORATION. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Designation Form, #3 Certificate of Service, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(PISANO, MATTHEW) Modified on 5/3/2021 (md, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
