KEELS v. BLANCHE et al
| DESMOND KEELS |
| MS. CARNEY BLANCHE, DEPUTY, MR. WILLIAMS, KEEFE and MS. MICHELLE FARRELL |
| 2:2021cv02271 |
| May 7, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| MITCHELL S GOLDBERG |
| Prisoner Petitions: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| DOC #6 MAILED TO KEELS (rf, ) |
Filing 6
ORDER THAT MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. IF KEEL SEEKS TO PROCEED IFP HE SHALL WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THIS ORDER FILE A CERTIFIED COPY OF HIS PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT AS OUTLINED HEREIN. ALTERNATIVELY, KEEL CAN PAY $402 TO THE CLERK OF COURT WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 5/25/21. 5/26/21 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO KEELS.(rf, )
|
| NOTICE PRO SE GUIDELINES #5 MAILED TO KEELS. (fdc) |
| Filing 5 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (bw, ) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by DESMOND KEELS..(bw, ) |
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by DESMOND KEELS. (bw, ) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against CARNEY BLANCHE, MICHELLE FARRELL, KEEFE, WILLIAMS, filed by DESMOND KEELS. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(bw, ) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by DESMOND KEELS..(bw, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
