TALBERT v. EVERS et al
CHARLES TALBERT |
JOSEPH H. EVERS, JACQUELINE F. ALLEN and IDEE E. FOX |
2:2021cv02505 |
May 28, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Philadelphia Office |
MARK A KEARNEY |
Prisoner Petitions: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER THAT WE DISMISS THE COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE AS FRIVOLOUS, FAILING TO STATE A CLAIM UPON WHICH RELIEF MAY BE GRANTED. WE DENY THE INCARCERATED PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AND TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER BASED ENTIRELY UPON HIS INCORPORATED COMPLAINT. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE; ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARK A. KEARNEY ON 6/4/21. 6/4/21 ENTERED AND NOT MAILED TO PRO SE.(JL ) |
Filing 4 MEMORANDUM; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARK A. KEARNEY ON 6/4/21. 6/4/21 ENTERED AND NOT MAILED TO PRO SE.(JL ) |
Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number PPE228100 (rf, ) |
PRO SE GUIDELINES MAILED TO TALBERT (rf, ) |
Filing 3 MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER filed by CHARLES TALBERT..(bw, ) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/3/2021: #1 Rule to Show Cause Order) (tjd, ). Modified on 6/3/2021 (tjd). |
Filing 2 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (bw, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JACQUELINE F. ALLEN, JOSEPH H. EVERS, IDEE E. FOX (Filing fee $ 402.), filed by CHARLES TALBERT. Modified on 6/3/2021 (bw, ). Modified on 6/3/2021 (tjd, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.