WILLIAMS et al v. CARNEY & PHILADELPHIA MUNICIPAL COURT et al
| CHARLES DAVIS and TAHKEAM WILLIAMS |
| BLANCHE CARNEY & PHILADELPHIA MUNICIPAL COURT, WARDEN, CURRANFROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and MAJOR MIRANDA & ALL CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS |
| 2:2021cv02536 |
| June 1, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| MICHAEL M BAYLSON |
| Prisoner Petitions: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER THAT WILLIAMS'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. IF WILLIAMS SEEKS TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, HE SHALL, WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, FILE A CERTIFIED COPY OF HIS PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT SHOWING ALL DEPOSITS, WITHDRAWALS AND A CURRENT BALANCE, FROM ANY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY IN WHICH HE WAS CONFINED DURING THE TIME PERIOD FROM 12/1/20 THROUGH 6/1/21. ALTERNATIVELY, WILLIAMS CAN PROCEED BY SUBMITTING $402 TO THE CLERK OF COURT WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. IF WILLIAMS FAILS TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER, HIS CASE MAY BE DISMISSED WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON ON 7/2/21.7/6/21 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PARTIES.(mbh, )
|
| Filing 5 Letter dated 6/30/21 by TAHKEAM WILLIAMS (mbh, ) |
| Replaced PDFs for ECF Nos 1 and 2 with signed documents (mbh, ) |
| COPY OF DOC. NOS. 1, 2 AND 4 HAVE BEEN MAILED TO PRO SE, WILLIAMS. (bw, ) |
| RemarkCOPY OF DOC. NO. 4 HAS BEEN MAILED TO PRO SE, DAVIS. (bw, ) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER THAT THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL SEND A COPY OF THE UNSIGNED MOTION [ECF NO 1] AND COMPLAINT [ECF NO 2] TO WILLIAMS. IF WILLIAMS SEEKS TO PROCEED WITH THIS CASE, HE SHALL SIGN THE MOTION AND COMPLAINT AND RETURN THEM TO THE COURT WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. WILLIAMS HAS FAILED TO FILE A CERTIFIED COPY OF HIS PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT FOR THE 6 MONTH PERIOD PRIOR TO THE FILING OF THIS CIVIL ACTION. IF WILLIAMS FAILS TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS HE SHALL WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, FILE A CERTIFIED COPY OF HIS PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT. IF WILLIAMS IS ULTIMATELY GRANTED LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS HE WILL BE OBLIGATED TO PAY THE $350 FILING FEE IN INSTALLMENTS EVEN IF THIS CASE IS DISMISSED. IF WILLIAMS FAILS TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER, THIS CASE MAY BE DISMISSED WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. THE COMPLAINT LODGED BY WILLIAMS ALSO NAMES AS PLAINTIFF CHARLES DAVID WHO HAS NEITHER SOUGHT LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERI NOR SIGNED HE COMPLAINT. CHARLES DAVID IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS A PARTY TO THIS MATTER. THE DISMISSAL IS WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO DAVID FILING SEPARATE COMPLAINT IN HIS OWN RIGHT, SIGNED BY HIM, ALONG WITH EITHER PAYMENT OF THE FEES OR A MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON ON 6/14/21. 6/14/21 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PRO SE (mbh, ).
|
| PRO SE GUIDELINES HAVE BEEN MAILED TO PRO SE, WILLIAMS AND DAVIS. (bw, ) |
| Filing 3 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (bw, ) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against BLANCHE CARNEY & PHILADELPHIA MUNICIPAL COURT, CURRANFROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, MAJOR MIRANDA & ALL CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS, WARDEN, filed by TAHKEAM WILLIAMS, CHARLES DAVIS.(bw, ) (Main Document 2 replaced on 6/30/2021) (mbh, ). |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by CHARLES DAVIS, TAHKEAM WILLIAMS..(bw, ) (Main Document 1 replaced on 6/30/2021) (mbh, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
