CATE et al v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY
| ENID CATE and STEPHEN CATE |
| STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY |
| 2:2021cv02570 |
| June 7, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| JOHN M YOUNGE |
| Contract: Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint together with with Affirmative Defenses to Plaintiffs' Complaint by STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Certificate of Service)(MUELLER, THOMAS) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Counsel of Filing of Copy of Notice for Removal with State Court by BONNIE S. STEIN on behalf of STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY(STEIN, BONNIE) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by MICHAEL K. KOVALSKY on behalf of ENID CATE, STEPHEN CATE with Jury Demand(KOVALSKY, MICHAEL) |
| Filing 2 Disclosure Statement Form pursuant to FRCP 7.1 by STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY.(STEIN, BONNIE) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0313-15171448), filed by STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Case Management Track Form, #3 Designation Form, #4 Notice of Removal to Adversary, #5 Exhibit A, #6 Certificate of Service)(STEIN, BONNIE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
