HOPKINS v. LUMINEX CORPORATION et al
| MATTHEW HOPKINS |
| STEPHEN L ECK, DIJUANA K LEWIS, LUMINEX CORPORATION, JIM D KEVER, KEVIN M MCNAMARA, KEN SAMET, EDWARD A OGUNRO, THOMAS W ERICKSON and NACHUM SHAMIR |
| 2:2021cv02618 |
| June 9, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| MICHAEL M BAYLSON |
| Other Statutes: Securities/Commodities |
| 12 U.S.C. ยง 22 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by MATTHEW HOPKINS As To ALL DEFENDANTS(GRABAR, JOSHUA) |
Filing 2
ORDER THAT PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SET FOR 7/1/2021 11:45 AM. ALL OTHER DEADLINES OUTLINED HEREIN. PLAINTIFF SHALL SERVE A COPY OF THIS ORDER WITH ALL DEFENDANTS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON ON 6/21/21. 6/21/21 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. *DEFENDANTS TO BE SERVED BY PLAINTIFFS COUNSEL*(rf, )
|
| Summons Issued as to STEPHEN L ECK, THOMAS W ERICKSON, JIM D KEVER, DIJUANA K LEWIS, LUMINEX CORPORATION, KEVIN M MCNAMARA, EDWARD A OGUNRO, KEN SAMET, NACHUM SHAMIR. E-MAILED To: COUNSEL on 6/10/21 (bw, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0313-15180225.), filed by MATTHEW HOPKINS. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Designation Form)(GRABAR, JOSHUA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
