GABBIDON v. MOORE et al
DOREEN GABBIDON |
CHARLIE MOORE and DOLLAR TREE STORES, INC. |
2:2021cv02872 |
June 29, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
EDUARDO C ROBRENO |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
MAILED OUT ORDER ENTRY #6 TO UNREP ON 8/2/21. (jaa, ) |
Filing 6 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO REMAND TO THE PHILADELPHIA COURT OF COMMON PLEAS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 7/30/21. 7/30/21 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. UNREP NOT MAILED. (va, ) |
Filing 5 STIPULATION TO REMAND TO PHILADELPHIA COURT OF COMMON PLEAS by DOREEN GABBIDON. (BURRUEZO, CHRISTOPHER) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by CHRISTOPHER MARK BURRUEZO on behalf of DOREEN GABBIDON (BURRUEZO, CHRISTOPHER) |
Filing 3 ORDER THAT THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE ASSIGNED TO THE ABOVE CAPTIONED CASE IS THE HONORABLE HENRY S. PERKIN; ETC.. SIGNED BY CLERK OF COURT KATE BARKMAN, CLERK OF COURT ON 7/15/21. 7/15/21 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(JL ) |
Filing 2 Original Record together with certified copy of docket entries received from Court of Common Pleas of PHILADELPHIA County. (jaa, ) |
Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number PPE229316 (sbt, ) |
Filing 1 NOTICE by DOLLAR TREE STORES, INC. OF REMOVAL (HUNTER, RAYMOND) ***(NO FEE NO IFP)*** Modified on 7/6/2021 (nd, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.