ROBINSON v. FREEMAN, MATHIS & GARY, LLP et al
ALBERT ROBINSON |
FREEMAN, MATHIS & GARY, LLP, JOHN DOE OR JANE DOE, WESLEY CALVIN JACKSON, DOOLY COUTY, GA, MORCOS ILKADIOUS and JOHN DOE |
2:2021cv02875 |
June 25, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
GENE EK PRATTER |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Memorandum and Order (4 & 5) mailed to Robinson. (fdc) |
Original record together with certified copy of docket entries forwarded to THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA. (JL) |
Filing 5 ORDER THAT THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO TRANSFER THIS CASE TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA. THE MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS SHALL REMAIN THE DISCRETION OF THE TRANSFEREE COURT; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 7/13/21. 7/14/21 ENTERED AND NOT MAILED TO PRO SE.(JL ) |
Filing 4 MEMORANDUM; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 7/13/21. 7/14/21 ENTERED AND NOT MAILED TO PRO SE.(JL ) |
Pro Se Guidelines #3 mailed to Robinson. (fdc) |
Filing 3 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (bw, ) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against DOOLY COUTY, GA, FREEMAN, MATHIS & GARY, LLP, MORCOS ILKADIOUS, WESLEY CALVIN JACKSON, JOHN DOE, JOHN DOE OR JANE DOE, filed by ALBERT ROBINSON. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(bw, ) Modified on 6/30/2021 (tjd). |
Filing 1 APPLICATION to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by ALBERT ROBINSON..(bw, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.