HARVEY v. SORBER et al
WILLIAM HARVEY |
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, JAIME SORBER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA |
2:2021cv02896 |
June 28, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
HENRY S PERKIN |
EDUARDO C ROBRENO |
Habeas Corpus: (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 MOTION TO STAY, filed by WILLIAM HARVEY..Motions referred to HENRY S. PERKIN.(sg, ) |
Filing 6 ORDERED THAT LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUERPIS IS DENIED AS MOOT. THE ABOVE CAPTIONED CASE IS REFERRED TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE PERKINS FOR A REPORT AND RECOMMENDAION. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL PROVIDE THE PHILADELPHIA COUNTY DA'S OFFICE AND THE OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL WITH A COPY OF THE PETITION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 7/12/2021.7/12/2021 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED TO DA AND ATTORNEY GENERAL.(sg, ) |
COPY OF DOC. NOS. 1 AND 5 HAVE BEEN MAILED TO PRO SE, HARVEY. (bw, ) |
Filing 5 ORDER THAT THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL SEND A COPY OF HARVEY'S UNSIGNED MOTION [ECF NO. 1] TO HIM. IF HARVEY SEEKS TO PROCEED WITH THIS CASE, HE SHALL SIGN THE MOTION AND RETURN IT TO THE COURT WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 7/2/21. 7/2/21 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PRO SE.(mbh, ) |
COPY OF PRO SE GUIDELINES HAVE BEEN MAILED TO PRO SE, HARVEY. (bw, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.