PALMER v. PHA
| DANNY PALMER |
| PHA, NADINE STEVENSON, STEVENSON'S SUPERVISOR ON DECEMBER 9, 2019, UNKNOWN SUPERVISOR, KAREN SIMMONS, PAULA PATRICK and TIFFANY FOX WORTHLESS |
| 2:2021cv02906 |
| June 28, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| EDUARDO C ROBRENO |
| Real Property: Rent Lease & Ejectment |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER THAT THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL AMEND THE DOCKET TO REFLECT THE DEFENDANTS AS NAMED IN THE AMENDED COMPLAINT. THE AMENDED COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 8/17/2. 8/18/21 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh, )
|
|
Filing 13
MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 8/17/21. 8/18/21 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh, )
|
|
Filing 12
Amended Complaint against PHA, Nadine Stevenson, Stevensons supervisor on December 9, 2019, Unknown Supervisor, Karen Simmons, Paula Patrick and Tiffany Fox Worthless filed by DANNY PALMER.(mbh, )
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER THAT THE MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS DENIED AS UNNECESSARY BECAUSE THE COURT HAS ALREADY GRANTED PALMER LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IN THIS MATTER. THE CLERK SHALL ADD THE EMAIL ADDRESS WHICH PALMER PROVIDED IN HIS MOTION.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 8/3/21.8/3/21 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh, )
|
|
Filing 10
Signed document - APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS - returned to court by DANNY PALMER. (mbh, )
|
|
MAILED OUT ORDER ENTRIES #8 #9 WITH COMPLAINT FORMS TO PLAINTIFF ON 7/26/21. (jaa, )
|
|
Filing 9
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT LEAVE TO PROCED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED. THE COMPLAINT IS DEEMED FILED. THE COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION FOR THE REASONS IN THE COURT'S MEMORANDUM. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 7/23/21. 7/23/21 ENTERED. NOT MAILED TO PALMER.(fdc)
|
|
Filing 8
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 7/23/21. 7/23/21 ENTERED. NOT MAILED TO PALMER. (fdc)
|
|
Filing 7
EXHIBIT by DANNY PALMER.. (sg, )
|
|
Filing 6
Signed document - APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS - returned to court by DANNY PALMER. (sg, )
|
|
Order #5 mailed to Palmer. (fdc)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER THAT THE U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE ASSIGNED TO THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED CASE IS THE HON. LYNNE A. SITARSKI. SIGNED BY CLERK OF COURT KATE BARKMAN, CLERK OF COURT ON 7/13/21. 7/13/21 ENTERED. NOT MAILED TO PALMER.(fdc)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER THAT THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL SEND A COPY OF THE UNSIGNED MOTION (DOC #1) TO PALMER. IF PALMER SEEKS TO PROCEED WITH HIS CASE, HE SHALL SIGN THE "AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF THE APPLICATION" ON THE FIRST PAGE OF THE MOTION AND RETURN THE SIGNED MOTION TO THE COURT WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. IF PALMER FAILS TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER, HIS CASE MAY BE DISMISSEDE WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 7/6/21. 7/6/21 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE (WITH UNSIGNED MOTION).(mbh, )
|
|
COPY OF PRO SE GUIDELINES HAVE BEEN MAILED TO PRO SE, PALMER. (bw, )
|
|
Filing 3
PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (bw, )
|
|
Filing 2
COMPLAINT against PHA, filed by DANNY PALMER.(bw, )
|
|
Filing 1
APPLICATION to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by DANNY PALMER..(bw, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
