Robinson v. Freitas-Meireles et al
Nettie Robinson |
Marinho Freitas-Meireles, United Financial Casualty Company and Marinho Freita Freitas |
2:2021cv02954 |
July 2, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
C DARNELL JONES |
P.I.: Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by KATHERINE COLE DOUGLAS on behalf of UNITED FINANCIAL CASUALTY COMPANY, United Financial Casualty Company (DOUGLAS, KATHERINE) |
COPY OF DOC. NO. 2 HAS BEEN MAILED TO UNREP. PARTIES. (bw, ) |
Filing 2 ORDER THAT TEN (10) DAYS PRIOR TO ANY MOTION BEING FILED, COUNSEL MUST NOTIFY OPPOSING COUNSEL TO DISCUSS THE SUBSTANCE OF THE POTENTIAL MOTION, & THE POSSIBLE RESOLUTION OF SAME. THESE DISCUSSIONS SHALL BE SUBSTANTIVE & NOT PERFUNCTORY. TO THIS END, COUNSEL SHALL PROVIDE THE OPPOSING PARTY WITH AN OPPORTUNITY TO CURE ANY ALLEGED DEFECTS PRIOR TO FILING A MOTION, ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE C. DARNELL JONES, II ON 7/8/21. 7/8/21 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. "NOT MAILED TO UNREP PARTIES"(kw, ) |
Summons Issued as to Marinho Freitas-Meireles, United Financial Casualty Company. E-MAILED To: COUNSEL on 7/6/21 (bw, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Marinho Freitas-Meireles, United Financial Casualty Company ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0313-15230783.), filed by Nettie Robinson.(SIMON, MARC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.