SPEIGHT v. ROSS DRESS FOR LESS et al
Plaintiff: SABRINA SPEIGHT
Defendant: ROSS DRESS FOR LESS, ROSS STORES INC. and ROSS STORES PENNSYLVANIA LP D/B/A ROSS PENNGEN INC.
Case Number: 2:2021cv03304
Filed: July 26, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: ANITA B BRODY
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER REFERRING CASE TO THE ARBITRATION DEPARTMENT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE ANITA B. BRODY ON 9/22/21. 9/22/21 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(jwl, )
September 22, 2021 Filing 8 NOTICE re: Cancellation of Hearing(jwl, )
September 22, 2021 Filing 7 Notice Re: Arbitration Videoconference (Attachments: #1 Consent)(sah)
September 21, 2021 Filing 6 CONSENT to Arbitration by ROSS DRESS FOR LESS, ROSS STORES INC., ROSS STORES PENNSYLVANIA LP D/B/A ROSS PENNGEN INC.(CHALIK, ELIZABETH)
August 11, 2021 Filing 5 Original Record together with certified copy of docket entries received from Court of Common Pleas of PHILADELPHIA County. (JL )
August 8, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by ALEXANDER GINSBURG on behalf of SABRINA SPEIGHT (GINSBURG, ALEXANDER)
August 3, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE of Hearing: A RULE 16 TELEPHONE CONFERENCE IS SET FOR 9/24/2021 AT 10:30 AM BEFORE HONORABLE ANITA B. BRODY.(jwl, )
August 2, 2021 Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint by ROSS DRESS FOR LESS, ROSS STORES INC., ROSS STORES PENNSYLVANIA LP D/B/A ROSS PENNGEN INC.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(CHALIK, ELIZABETH)
July 26, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by ROSS STORES PENNSYLVANIA LP D/B/A ROSS PENNGEN INC., ROSS STORES INC., ROSS DRESS FOR LESS (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number APAEDC-15282502), filed by ROSS STORES PENNSYLVANIA LP D/B/A ROSS PENNGEN INC., ROSS STORES INC., ROSS DRESS FOR LESS. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Designation Form)(CHALIK, ELIZABETH)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SPEIGHT v. ROSS DRESS FOR LESS et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: SABRINA SPEIGHT
Represented By: ALEXANDER GINSBURG
Represented By: PETER C. BOWERS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ROSS DRESS FOR LESS
Represented By: ELIZABETH CHALIK
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ROSS STORES INC.
Represented By: ELIZABETH CHALIK
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ROSS STORES PENNSYLVANIA LP D/B/A ROSS PENNGEN INC.
Represented By: ELIZABETH CHALIK
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?