YAN YAN
In Re: YAN YAN
Case Number: 2:2021cv03594
Filed: August 3, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: EDUARDO C ROBRENO
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 18, 2021 PAPER #3 ALONG WITH FORMS MAILED TO PRO SE (JL )
August 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER THAT IF YAN SEEKS TO PROCEED WITH THIS ACTION HE MUST, WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, EITHER (1) PAY $402 (COMPRISING THE $350 FILING FEE AND THE $52 ADMINISTRATIVE FEE) TO THE CLERK OF COURT, OR (2) FILE A MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO SEND YAN AN APPROPRIATE NON-PRISONER APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 8/16/2021. 8/17/2021 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg, )
August 3, 2021 Filing 2 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (bw, )
August 3, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT by YAN YAN. (NO FEE PAID; NO IFP FILED) (bw, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: YAN YAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
In re: YAN YAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?