ARMSTRONG TEASDALE LLP v. MARTORELLO et al
| ARMSTRONG TEASDALE LLP |
| MATT MARTORELLO, REBECCA MARTORELLO, JUSTIN MARTORELLO, GALLANT CAPITAL LLC, LIONT LLC and EVENTIDE CREDIT ACQUISITIONS LLC |
| 2:2021cv03631 |
| August 14, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| CHAD F KENNEY |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER THAT UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE ASSIGNED TO THE ABOVE CAPTIONED CASE IS THE HONORALE RICHARD A. LLORET. SIGNED BY CLERK OF COURT KATE BARKMAN, CLERK OF COURT ON 8/30/21. 8/30/21 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(rf, )
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by MICHAEL J. ENGLE on behalf of ARMSTRONG TEASDALE LLP (ENGLE, MICHAEL) |
| Filing 6 EXHIBITS to #1 Complaint by ARMSTRONG TEASDALE LLP.(FILED UNDER SEAL)(md, ) Modified on 8/20/2021 (md, ). (md, ). |
|
Filing 5
ORDERED THAT COUNSEL CONTEMPLATING FILING A MOTION UNDER FED. R. CIV. P. 12(B)(6), (E), OR (F), SHALL FIRST CONTACT OPPOSING COUNSEL TO DISCUSS THE SUBSTANCE OF THE CONTEMPLATED MOTION AND TO PROVIDE AN OPPORTUNITY TO CURE ANY ALLEGED PLEADING DEFICIENCIES OR STRIKE CERTAIN MATTER. THIS CONFERENCE SHALL TAKE PLACE AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS BEFORE THE FILING OF THE MOTION1. THE PARTIES SHALL CONDUCT SUBSTANTIVE VERBAL COMMUNICATIONS. EXCHANGES OF LETTERS OR EMAILS ARE INSUFFICIENT. A REPORT THAT OPPOSING COUNSEL WAS NOT AVAILABLE OR THAT THE PARTIES MADE REASONABLE EFFORTS IS LIKEWISE INSUFFICIENT. IF THE PARTIES CANNOT REACH A RESOLUTION THAT ELIMINATES THE NEED FOR ANY OF THE ABOVE-MENTIONED MOTIONS, COUNSEL FOR THE MOVING PARTY SHALL INCLUDE, ALONG WITH THE MOTION, A CERTIFICATION THAT THE PARTIES MET AND CONFERRED REGARDING THE ALLEGED PLEADING DEFICIENCIES OR MATTER SOUGHT TO BE STRICKEN. THE COURT WILL DENY ANY 12(B)(6), (E) OR (F) MOTION THAT FAILS TO CONFORM WITH THESE REQUIREMENTS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CHAD F. KENNEY ON 8/16/21. 8/17/21 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(jaa, )
|
|
Filing 4
ORDERED THAT THE MOTION (ECF NO. 2) IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT ITSELF (ECF NO. 1) SHALL NOT BE FILED UNDER SEAL; THE EXHIBITS TO THE COMPLAINT (ECF NOS. 1-4, 1-5, 1-6 AND 1-7, AND ECF NO. 3) SHALL BE FILED UNDER SEAL; AND PLAINTIFF MAY FILE THE ATTACHMENT TO ITS CORPORATE DISCLOSURE UNDER SEAL. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CHAD F. KENNEY ON 8/16/21.8/16/21 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(jaa, )
|
| Summons Issued as to EVENTIDE CREDIT ACQUISITIONS LLC, GALLANT CAPITAL LLC, LIONT LLC, JUSTIN MARTORELLO, MATT MARTORELLO, REBECCA MARTORELLO. E-MAILED To: COUNSEL on 8/16/21 (bw, ) |
| Filing 3 EXHIBITS 1 through 4 re #1 Complaint by ARMSTRONG TEASDALE LLP.(FILED UNDER SEAL)(md, ) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/16/2021: #1 Sealed Document, #2 Sealed Document, #3 Sealed Document) (md, ). |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by ARMSTRONG TEASDALE LLP. (md, ) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Seal Document #1 Complaint (Attorney), Exhibits 1-4 filed by ARMSTRONG TEASDALE LLP.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(LOVE, CARRIE) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against EVENTIDE CREDIT ACQUISITIONS LLC, GALLANT CAPITAL LLC, LIONT LLC, JUSTIN MARTORELLO, MATT MARTORELLO, REBECCA MARTORELLO ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number BPAEDC-15337620.), filed by ARMSTRONG TEASDALE LLP. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Designation Form, #3 Case Management Track Form, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit)(LOVE, CARRIE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
