ROARK v. IRIZARRY et al
Plaintiff: COURTNEY ROARK
Defendant: BRIAN IRIZARRY, GUY'S COLLISION CENTER and PA STATE POLICE DEPT.
Case Number: 2:2021cv04107
Filed: September 15, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: JUAN R SANCHEZ
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 10, 2021 Filing 5 First MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by GUY'S COLLISION CENTER.Motion. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum Memo. in Support of Motion, #2 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order, #3 Certificate of Service, #4 Certificate of Compliance, #5 Entry of Appearance)(LABRUM, KATHRYN)
September 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER THAT THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE ASSIGNED TO THE ABOVE CAPTIONED CASE IS MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARILYN HEFFLEY; ETC.. SIGNED BY CLERK OF COURT KATE BARKMAN, CLERK OF COURT ON 9/28/21. 9/28/21 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(JL )
September 27, 2021 Summons Issued as to GUY'S COLLISION CENTER, BRIAN IRIZARRY, PA STATE POLICE DEPT.. Forwarded To: EMAILED TO PLAINTIFF on 9/27/21 (JL )
September 27, 2021 Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number PPE232229 (sg, )
September 21, 2021 MAILED OUT NON-PRISONER IFP FORMS TO PLAINTIFF ON 9/21/21. (jaa, )
September 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER THAT IF ROARK SEEKS TO PROCEED WITH THIS CASE, HE MUST, WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, EITHER (1) PAY $402 TO THE CLERK OF COURT OR (2) FILE A MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL PROVIDE ROARK WITH AN APPROPRIATE NON-PRISONER APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, BEARING THE CIVIL ACTION NUMBER; ETC.. SIGNED BY CHIEF JUDGE JUAN R. SANCHEZ ON 9/20/21. 9/20/21 ENTERED AND E-MAILED, FORMS NOT MAILED TO PRO SE.(JL )
September 15, 2021 Filing 2 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (bw, )
September 15, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against GUY'S COLLISION CENTER, BRIAN IRIZARRY, PA STATE POLICE DEPT., filed by COURTNEY ROARK. (NO FEE PAID; NO IFP FILED) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 E-MAIL)(bw, )
September 15, 2021 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by COURTNEY ROARK. (bw, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ROARK v. IRIZARRY et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: COURTNEY ROARK
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BRIAN IRIZARRY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: GUY'S COLLISION CENTER
Represented By: KATHRYN L. LABRUM
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PA STATE POLICE DEPT.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?