WILLIAMS v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al

Justia Dockets & Filings Third Circuit Pennsylvania Eastern District WILLIAMS v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al

WILLIAMS v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al

Case Number:	2:2021cv04135
Filed:	November 1, 2021
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office:	Philadelphia Office
Nature of Suit:	Prisoner Petitions: Prison Condition
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 25, 2022	Filing 19 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT WILLIAMS'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM, PURSUANT TO 28 USC SEC. 1915A(b)(1), FOR THE REASONS STATED IN THE COURT'S MEMORANDUM. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY CHIEF JUDGE JUAN R. SANCHEZ ON 1/25/22. 1/25/22 ENTERED. NOT MAILED TO WILLIAMS. (fdc)
November 1, 2021	Filing 11 ORDER THAT THE COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED IN ITS ENTIRETY PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. SEC. 1915A(b)(1), ETC. WILLIAMS' CLAIMS AGAINST THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; & WILLIAMS' CLAIMS AGAINST JOHN E. WETZEL & DEREK F. OBE RLANDER ARE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. WILLIAMS MAY FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER ONLY AS TO THOSE CLAIMS THE COURT DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, ETC. UPON THE FILING OF AN AMENDED COMPLAINT, THE CLERK SHALL NOT MAKE SERVICE UNTIL SO ORDERED BY THE COURT. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO SEND WILLIAMS A BLANK COPY OF THE COURT'S FORM COMPLAINT FOR A PRISONER FILING A CIVIL RIGHTS ACTION BEARING THE ABOVE CIVIL ACTION NUMBER, ETC. THE MOTION FOR DISCOVERY, INTERROGATORIES & REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. SIGNED BY CHIEF JUDGE JUAN R. SANCHEZ ON 11/1/21. 11/2/21 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PLFF TOGETHER WITH BLANK COPY OF COMPLAINT.(kw, )

Date Filed

Document Text

January 25, 2022

Filing 19 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT WILLIAMS'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM, PURSUANT TO 28 USC SEC. 1915A(b)(1), FOR THE REASONS STATED IN THE COURT'S MEMORANDUM. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY CHIEF JUDGE JUAN R. SANCHEZ ON 1/25/22. 1/25/22 ENTERED. NOT MAILED TO WILLIAMS. (fdc)

November 1, 2021

Filing 11 ORDER THAT THE COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED IN ITS ENTIRETY PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. SEC. 1915A(b)(1), ETC. WILLIAMS' CLAIMS AGAINST THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; & WILLIAMS' CLAIMS AGAINST JOHN E. WETZEL & DEREK F. OBE RLANDER ARE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. WILLIAMS MAY FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER ONLY AS TO THOSE CLAIMS THE COURT DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, ETC. UPON THE FILING OF AN AMENDED COMPLAINT, THE CLERK SHALL NOT MAKE SERVICE UNTIL SO ORDERED BY THE COURT. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO SEND WILLIAMS A BLANK COPY OF THE COURT'S FORM COMPLAINT FOR A PRISONER FILING A CIVIL RIGHTS ACTION BEARING THE ABOVE CIVIL ACTION NUMBER, ETC. THE MOTION FOR DISCOVERY, INTERROGATORIES & REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. SIGNED BY CHIEF JUDGE JUAN R. SANCHEZ ON 11/1/21. 11/2/21 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PLFF TOGETHER WITH BLANK COPY OF COMPLAINT.(kw, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: WILLIAMS v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?