WILLIAMS v. MAHONEY
KAREEMA WILLIAMS |
STEPHEN MAHONEY, JR |
2:2021cv04173 |
September 22, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
C DARNELL JONES |
P.I.: Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT of Service by CERTIFIED MAIL re: served COMPLAINT upon STEPHEN MAHONEY JR. by CERTIFIED MAIL on 10/19/2021 (SIMON, MARC) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by CHRISTOPHER MARK BURRUEZO on behalf of KAREEMA WILLIAMS (BURRUEZO, CHRISTOPHER) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by MARC I. SIMON on behalf of KAREEMA WILLIAMS**(FILED IN ERROR, INCORRECT ATTY LOGIN, REFILED AT DOCUMENT #4 )** (SIMON, MARC) Modified on 10/29/2021 (tjd). |
Filing 2 ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: (1) TEN (10) DAYS PRIOR TO ANY MOTION BEING FILED (INCLUDING A MOTION UNDER FED.R.CIV.P. 12 OR 56, 28 U.S.C. 1441, OR 28 U.S.C. 1404), COUNSEL MUST NOTIFY OPPOSING COUNSEL TO DISCUSS THE SUBSTANCE OF THE POTENTIAL MOTION, AND THE POSSIBLE RESOLUTION OF SAME. THESE DISCUSSIONS SHALL BE SUBSTANTIVE AND NOT PERFUNCTORY. TO THIS END, COUNSEL SHALL PROVIDE THE OPPOSING PARTY WITH AN OPPORTUNITY TO CURE ANY ALLEGED DEFECTS PRIOR TO FILING A MOTION;2 (2) IN THE EVENT THE PARTIES ARE UNABLE TO PRELIMINARILY NEGATE THE NEED FOR THE FILING OF A MOTION AFTER ENGAGING IN SUBSTANTIVE DISCUSSIONS, THE MOVING PARTY SHALL SO SPECIFY IN A CERTIFICATION ATTACHED AND FILED WITH THE MOTION. SAID CERTIFICATION SHALL INDICATE THE DATE(S) OF DISCUSSION(S) AND SHALL INFORM THE COURT OF THE PARTIES INABILITY TO REACH A RESOLUTION; AND, (3) FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER SHALL RESULT IN DENIAL OF THE MOTION WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE C. DARNELL JONES, II ON 9/22/21. 9/23/21 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(jaa, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against STEPHEN MAHONEY, JR ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number APAEDC-15424199.), filed by KAREEMA WILLIAMS.(SIMON, MARC) |
Summons Issued as to STEPHEN MAHONEY, JR. E-MAILED To: COUNSEL on 9/22/21 (bw, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: WILLIAMS v. MAHONEY | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: KAREEMA WILLIAMS | |
Represented By: | MARC I. SIMON |
Represented By: | CHRISTOPHER MARK BURRUEZO |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: STEPHEN MAHONEY, JR | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.