RAMOS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
NELSON RAMOS |
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, THOMAS LICIARDELLO, BRIAN REYNOLDS, PERRY BETTS, MICHAEL SPICER, JOHN SPEISER, LINWOOD NORMAN and TIMOTHY BOGAN |
2:2021cv04255 |
September 27, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
PAUL S DIAMOND |
Prisoner Petitions: Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
|
Filing 4 NOTICE by CITY OF PHILADELPHIA of Letter Request to Mark this Case as Related to No. 13-2773 (FARIS, KATHRYN) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by KATHRYN FARIS on behalf of CITY OF PHILADELPHIA with certificate of service(FARIS, KATHRYN) |
Filing 2 AFFIDAVIT of Service by Christopher J Mullen re: served Summons & Complaint upon All Defendants by Electronic Mail (Covid) on 10/15/2021, answers due 11/5/2021 (SWEENEY, THOMAS) Modified on 10/21/2021 (tjd). |
Summons Issued as to PERRY BETTS, TIMOTHY BOGAN, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, THOMAS LICIARDELLO, LINWOOD NORMAN, BRIAN REYNOLDS, JOHN SPEISER, MICHAEL SPICER. E-MAILED To: COUNSEL on 9/28/21 (bw, ) |
DEMAND for Trial by Jury by NELSON RAMOS. (JL ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number APAEDC-15435843.), filed by NELSON RAMOS. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Case Management Track Form, #3 Designation Form)(SWEENEY, THOMAS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.