SBS CONTINUUM CARE, LLC v. BOROUGH OF PENNDEL PENNSYLVANIA et al
Plaintiff: SBS CONTINUUM CARE, LLC
Defendant: BOROUGH OF PENNDEL PENNSYLVANIA and ZONING HEARING BOARD OF PENNDEL BOROUGH
Case Number: 2:2021cv04427
Filed: October 7, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: JOHN M YOUNGE
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Accomodations
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 24, 2021 Filing 7 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME by BOROUGH OF PENNDEL PENNSYLVANIA, ZONING HEARING BOARD OF PENNDEL BOROUGH. (GONZALES, JOHN)
November 24, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by JOHN P. GONZALES on behalf of BOROUGH OF PENNDEL PENNSYLVANIA, ZONING HEARING BOARD OF PENNDEL BOROUGH with Certificate of Service (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(GONZALES, JOHN)
November 24, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by KATHERINE ANN CORDRY on behalf of BOROUGH OF PENNDEL PENNSYLVANIA, ZONING HEARING BOARD OF PENNDEL BOROUGH with Certificate of Service (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(CORDRY, KATHERINE)
November 9, 2021 Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT of Service by Scott Segal re: served Summons and Complaint Zoning Hearing Board of Penndel Borough upon Karen Kondrak by Personal on 11/04/2021, answer due 11/26/2021. (NEWMAN, NANCY) Modified on 11/15/2021 (tjd).
November 9, 2021 Filing 3 AFFIDAVIT of Service by Scott Segal re: served Summons and Complaint Borough of Penndel, Pennsylvania upon Karen Kondrak by Personal on 11/04/2021, answer due 11/26/2021. (NEWMAN, NANCY) Modified on 11/15/2021 (tjd).
November 4, 2021 Filing Fee for PRO HAC VICE by SBS CONTINUUM CARE, LLC. (Filing Fee $40, receipt number APAEDC-15526885). (NEWMAN, NANCY)
October 13, 2021 Filing 2 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice STEVEN G. POLIN filed by SBS CONTINUUM CARE, LLC..(NEWMAN, NANCY)
October 8, 2021 Summons Issued as to BOROUGH OF PENNDEL PENNSYLVANIA, ZONING HEARING BOARD OF PENNDEL BOROUGH. E-MAILED To: COUNSEL on 10/8/21 (bw, )
October 7, 2021 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by SBS CONTINUUM CARE, LLC. (JL )
October 7, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number APAEDC-15462675.), filed by SBS CONTINUUM CARE, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Designation Form)(NEWMAN, NANCY)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SBS CONTINUUM CARE, LLC v. BOROUGH OF PENNDEL PENNSYLVANIA et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: SBS CONTINUUM CARE, LLC
Represented By: NANCY MARCUS NEWMAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BOROUGH OF PENNDEL PENNSYLVANIA
Represented By: JOHN P. GONZALES
Represented By: KATHERINE ANN CORDRY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ZONING HEARING BOARD OF PENNDEL BOROUGH
Represented By: JOHN P. GONZALES
Represented By: KATHERINE ANN CORDRY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?