Ucar et al v. Goldberg et al
Ana Maria Chirinos Nava and Jorge Luis Ucar Chirinos |
Philip Goldberg, ANTONY BLINKEN, MERRICK B. GARLAND and ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS |
Jorge Alejandro Ucar |
2:2021cv04614 |
October 21, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO |
Immigration: Other Immigration Actions |
08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by LAUREN E. DEBRUICKER on behalf of ANTONY BLINKEN, MERRICK B. GARLAND, Philip Goldberg, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS with Certificate of Service(DEBRUICKER, LAUREN) |
Filing 2 Acceptance of Service by U.S. Attorney Re: accepted summons and complaint on behalf of the United States Attorney (only). (rf, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Writ of Mandamus against ANTONY BLINKEN, MERRICK B. GARLAND, Philip Goldberg, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number APAEDC-15491788.), filed by Jorge Alejandro Ucar, Jorge Luis Ucar Chirinos, Ana Maria Chirinos Nava. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service, #2 Exhibit Table of Contents/Exhibits, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Designation Form, #5 Disclosure Form)(SOLOW, ADAM) |
Summons Issued as to ANTONY BLINKEN, MERRICK B. GARLAND, Philip Goldberg, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General E-MAILED To: COUNSEL on 10/21/21. SUMMONS AS TO AUSA E-MAILED ON 10/21/21. (bw, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.