DENNIS v. BRITTAIN et al
| JEFFREY DENNIS |
| SUPERINTENDENT K. BRITTIAN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and SUPERINTENDENT K. BRITTAIN |
| 2:2021cv04849 |
| November 1, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| TIMOTHY J SAVAGE |
| Habeas Corpus: (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ELECTION, by JEFFREY DENNIS (sg, ) |
| Filing 4 PETITION FOR STAY OF ADVANCE by JEFFREY DENNIS. (sg, ) (Main Document 4 replaced on 12/21/2021) (nd, ). |
| DOC. NO. #3 WAS MAILED TO PRO SE ON 11/17/21. (amas, ) |
Filing 3
ORDER THAT WITHIN THIRTY DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, PETITIONER SHALL COMPLETE, SIGNAND FILE THE NOTICE OF ELECTION FORM INCLUDED WITH THIS ORDER AND INDICATE WHETHER HEWISHES TO WITHDRAW HIS CURRENT PETITION, OR HAVE THE PETITION RULED. ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE ON 11/15/2021. 11/16/2021 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PRO SE.(sg, )
|
| NOTICE OF PRO SE GUIDELINES #2 MAILED TO DENNIS. (fdc) |
| Filing 2 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (bw, ) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5.), filed by JEFFREY DENNIS. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-K, #2 Exhibit L-Q, #3 Exhibit R-W)(bw, ) |
| Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number PPE233517 (sbt, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
