BLATCH v. RIVELLO et al
HAKIM BLATCH |
JOHN RIVELLO, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA |
2:2021cv04879 |
November 3, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
GERALD J PAPPERT |
Habeas Corpus: (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
MAILED OUT ORDER ENTRY #6 TO PETITIONER ON 11/22/21. (jaa, ) |
Filing 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS, IT IS RESPECTFULLY RECOMMENDED THE PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS BE STAYED AND HELD IN ABEYANCE WHILE PETITIONER FURTHER LITIGATES HIS PCRA PETITION. ETC.. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE TIMOTHY R. RICE ON 11/19/2021. (Attachments: #1 PROPOSED ORDER, #2 NOTICE) 11/19/2021 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PRO SE.(sg, ) |
Document 5 Mailed to HAKIM BLATCH. (DT) |
EMAILED ORDER TO DA AND ATTORNEY GENERAL WITH PETITION. (sg, ) |
![]() |
Filing 4 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by HAKIM BLATCH. (sg, ) Modified on 11/9/2021 (lisad, ). |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by HAKIM BLATCH..(sg, ) |
NOTICE OF PRO SE GUIDELINES HAVE BEEN MAILED TO PRO SE, BLATCH. (bw, ) |
Filing 2 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (bw, ) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by HAKIM BLATCH. (NO FEE PAID; NO IFP FILED)(bw, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.