RISTER v. MEYER et al
| TARRELL R. RISTER |
| GREGORY MEYER, MICHAEL T. LAVERGHETTA, JOHN DOE #1, JOHN DOE #2, JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 |
| 2:2021cv05058 |
| November 10, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| JOHN R PADOVA |
| Prisoner Petitions: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by TARRELL R. RISTER. (ENVELOPE ATTACHED) (dt, ) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by TARRELL R. RISTER. (ENVELOPE ATTACHED)(dt, ) |
Filing 3
ORDER THAT IF RISTER SEEKS TO PROCEED WITH THIS ACTION, WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, EITHER PAY $402 TO THE CLERK OF COURT, OR FILE A MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS WITH A CERTIFIED COPY OF HIS PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT AS OUTLINED HEREIN. THE CLERK SHALL FURNISH RISTER WITH A BLANK COPY OF THIS COURT'S CURRENT STANDARD PRISONER IN FORMA PAUPERIS FORM. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOHN R. PADOVA ON 12/1/21. 12/2/21 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE WITH IFP FORM.(amas, )
|
| Notice of Pro Se Guidelines (#2) mailed to Rister. (fdc) |
| Filing 2 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (bw, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JANE DOE #1, JANE DOE #2, JOHN DOE #1, JOHN DOE #2, MICHAEL T. LAVERGHETTA, GREGORY MEYER, filed by TARRELL RISTER. (NO FEE PAID; NO IFP FILED)(bw, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
