FRANK v. MILLENNIUM MOVING COMPANY, LLC et al
| KATHY FRANK |
| MILLENNIUM MOVING COMPANY, LLC and MATTHEW ELSENBECK |
| 2:2021cv05102 |
| November 18, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| JOSHUA D WOLSON |
| Civil Rights: Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by KATHY FRANK re: Robert Campbell served Summons and Complaint upon MATTHEW ELSENBECK, MILLENNIUM MOVING COMPANY, LLC by Hand Delivery. MATTHEW ELSENBECK served on 1/12/2022, answer due 2/2/2022; MILLENNIUM MOVING COMPANY, LLC served on 1/12/2022, answer due 2/2/2022. (SHIKUNOV, ERICA) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE THAT, UNLESS SERVICE OF THE COMPLAINT IS MADE BY FEBRUARY 17, 2022, THE ACTION WILL BE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION UNLESS GOOD CAUSE FOR THE FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH RULE 4(m) IS SHOWN PRIOR TO THAT TIME. (ENTERED AND EMAILED, 1/12/2022)(ja) |
| Summons Issued as to MATTHEW ELSENBECK, MILLENNIUM MOVING COMPANY, LLC. E-MAILED To: COUNSEL on 11/19/21 (bw, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MATTHEW ELSENBECK, MILLENNIUM MOVING COMPANY, LLC ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number APAEDC-15560156.), filed by KATHY FRANK. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Designation Form)(SHIKUNOV, ERICA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
