FASBINDER et al v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
LEE ANN FASBINDER and SCOTT FASBINDER |
MERCK & CO., INC., MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP., JOHN DOE, JANE DOE and XYZ CORP |
2:2021cv05273 |
December 1, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
HARVEY BARTLE |
P.I.: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by LEE ANN FASBINDER, SCOTT FASBINDER. MERCK & CO., INC. waiver sent on 12/3/2021, answer due 2/1/2022. (SADAKA, MARK) |
Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by LEE ANN FASBINDER, SCOTT FASBINDER. MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. waiver sent on 12/3/2021, answer due 2/1/2022. (SADAKA, MARK) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by DINO S. SANGIAMO on behalf of MERCK & CO., INC., MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. with Certificate of Service(SANGIAMO, DINO) |
Summons Issued as to MERCK & CO., INC., MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.. E-MAILED To: COUNSEL on 12/2/21 (bw, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JANE DOE, JOHN DOE, MERCK & CO., INC., MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP., XYZ CORP ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number APAEDC-15582412.), filed by LEE ANN FASBINDER, SCOTT FASBINDER. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Case Management Track Form, #3 Designation Form)(SADAKA, MARK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.