BROOKS v. SMITH et al
| MICHAEL BROOKS |
| BARRY SMITH, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BUCKS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA |
| 2:2021cv05475 |
| December 15, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| ELIZABETH T HEY |
| MARK A KEARNEY |
| Habeas Corpus: (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
Petitioner, Michael Brooks's Traverse in Opposition to the Findings of Timothy W. Lutes, Esq., Assistant District Attorney of Bucks County, Certificate of Service. (fdc)
|
|
Filing 7
Response in Opposition To Petition For Habeas Corpus Relief And Memorandum Of Law In Support Thereof by THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BUCKS. (LUTES, TIMOTHY)
|
|
Filing 6
Letter from the Chambers of Magistrate Judge Hey acknowledging receipt of State Court Record (rf, )
|
|
Receipt of State Court Record on 1/11/22, sent from COURT OF COMMON PLEAS BUCKS COUNTY to CLERKS OFFICE and forwarded to Chambers of Magistrate Judge Hey (rf, )
|
|
PAPER #5 MAILED TO PRO SE (JL )
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER THAT THE THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF BUCKS COUNTY IS ADDED AS A PARTY RESPONDENT AND THE CAPTION IS HEREBY SO AMENDED. THE THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF BUCKS COUNTY SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK OF THIS COURT COPIES OF ALL RECORDS, INCLUDING TRANSCRIPTS OF NOTES OF TESTIMONY AT ARRAIGNMENT, TRIAL, SENTENCING, SUPPRESSION HEARINGS, POST CONVICTION HEARINGS, PETITIONS, PLEADINGS, OPINIONS AND BRIEFS OF STATE COURT PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF COMMONWEALTH VS BROOKS, COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF BUCKS,CP-09-CR-0005547-2012 WITHIN 20 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. PRISONER STATE RECORD DUE BY 1/27/2022.. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH T. HEY ON 12/28/21. 12/28/21 ENTERED AND E-MAILED TO BCCP, BUCKS COUNTY DA, NOT MAILED TO PRO SE.(JL )
|
|
PETITION #1, ORDER #5 AND DOCKET TO BUCKS COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY; PAPER #5 TO BCCP. (JL )
|
|
DOCUMENT #1 PETITION, ORDER #4, & DOCKET SHEET E-MAILED TO BUCKS COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE AND PA OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL. (kw, )
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER THAT WE REFER THE PETITION TO THE HONORABLE ELIZABETH T. HEY, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE, FOR A REPORT & RECOMMENDATION, ETC. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL PROVIDE THE BUCKS COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE AND THE PA OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL WITH A COPY OF THE PETITION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARK A. KEARNEY ON 12/23/21. 12/27/21 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER.(kw, )
|
|
PAPER #3 ALONG WITH FORMS MAILED TO PRO SE (JL )
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER THAT THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL FURNISH PETITIONER WITH A BLANK COPY OF THIS COURT'S CURRENT APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS BEARING THE ABOVE CIVIL ACTION NUMBER. IF THE PETITIONER SEEKS TO PROCEED WITH THIS CASE HE MUST, NO LATER THAN 1/20/22, EITHER (1)PAY THE REQUIRED $5.00 FILING FEE TO THE CLERK OF COURT OR (2) COMPLETE AND RETURN THE APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, INCLUDING THE REQUIRED CERTIFICATION OF PRISON ASSETS SIGNED BY A PRISON OFFICIAL TO THE CLERK OF COURT; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARK A. KEARNEY ON 12/21/21. 12/21/21 ENTERED AND NOT MAILED TO PRO SE WITH FORMS.(JL )
|
|
Document #2 mailed to MICHAEL BROOKS. (mac, )
|
|
Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number PPE235091 (sbt, )
|
|
Filing 2
PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (bw, )
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by MICHAEL BROOKS. (NO FEE PAID; NO IFP FILED)(bw, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
