CARTWRIGHT v. PORTFOLIO RECOVERY SYSTEMS
| JUSTIN CARTWRIGHT |
| PORTFOLIO RECOVERY SYSTEMS |
| 2:2021cv05499 |
| December 17, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| PAUL S DIAMOND |
| Other Statutes: Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MAILED OUT ORDER ENTRY #7 AND COMPLAINT FORMS TO PLAINTIFF ON 1/27/22. (jaa, ) |
Filing 7
ORDER THAT 1. CARTWRIGHTS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (DOC. NO. 6) IS GRANTED PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1915. 2. CARTWRIGHTS UNSIGNED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (DOC. NO. 1) IS DENIED AS MOOT. 3. THE AMENDED COMPLAINT IS DEEMED FILED. 4. THE AMENDED COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 5. CARTWRIGHT MAY FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. UPON THE FILING OF A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT, THE CLERK SHALL NOT MAKE SERVICE UNTIL SO ORDERED BY THE COURT. 6. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO SEND CARTWRIGHT A BLANK COPY OF THIS COURTS CURRENT STANDARD FORM TO BE USED BY A SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT FILING A CIVIL ACTION BEARING THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED CIVIL ACTION NUMBER.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PAUL S. DIAMOND ON 1/26/2022.1/26/2022 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED TO PRO SE.(sg) Modified on 1/27/2022 (lisad, ).
|
| PAPER #4 MAILED TO PRO SE (JL ) |
|
Filing 4
ORDERED THAT: CARTWRIGHT IS DIRECTED TO COMPLETE THE AFFIDAVIT AND THE DECLARATION FORMATTACHED TO THIS ORDER WITH HIS ORIGINAL SIGNATURE, AND RETURN THOSE SIGNED DOCUMENTS TO THE COURT WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER TO CURE THESE DEFICIENCIES WITH THE MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND COMPLAINT. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO SEND A COPY OF THIS ORDER TO CARTWRIGHTALONG WITH A COPY OF THE ATTACHED AFFIDAVIT AND DECLARATION FORM AND NOTE THE MAILING ON THE DOCKET. NO SUMMONS SHALL ISSUE AT THIS TIME.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PAUL S. DIAMOND ON 1/3/2022. 1/4/2022 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PRO SE.(sg, )
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by JUSTIN CARTWRIGHT..(sg, ) |
| Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against PORTFOLIO RECOVERY SYSTEMS, filed by JUSTIN CARTWRIGHT.(sg, ) Modified on 1/11/2022 (sg). (Main Document 5 replaced on 1/11/2022) (sg). |
| Filing 3 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (bw, ) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against PORTFOLIO RECOVERY SYSTEMS, filed by JUSTIN CARTWRIGHT. (Attachments: #1 E-MAIL)(bw, ) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by JUSTIN CARTWRIGHT..(bw, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: CARTWRIGHT v. PORTFOLIO RECOVERY SYSTEMS | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: JUSTIN CARTWRIGHT | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: PORTFOLIO RECOVERY SYSTEMS | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
