OPEX CORPORATION v. INVATA, LLC et al
Plaintiff: OPEX CORPORATION
Defendant: INVATA, LLC and HC ROBOTICS
Case Number: 2:2021cv05575
Filed: December 21, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: BERLE M SCHILLER
Nature of Suit: Property Rights: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 145
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER THAT THE APPLICATION OF GOUTAM PATNAIK, ESQ. TO PRACTICE IN THIS COURT PURSUANT TO LRCP 83.5.2(B) IS GRANTED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE BERLE M. SCHILLER ON 2/11/22. 2/11/22 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc)
February 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER THAT THE APPLICATION OF DAVID J. SHAW, ESQ. TO PRACTICE IN THIS COURT PURSUANT TO LRCP 83.5.2(B) IS GRANTED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE BERLE M. SCHILLER ON 2/11/22. 2/11/22 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc)
February 10, 2022 Filing 6 APPLICATION for Admission Pro Hac Vice of David J. Shaw by OPEX CORPORATION. ( Filing fee $ 40 receipt number APAEDC-15720112.). (HICKOK, ROBERT)
February 10, 2022 Filing 5 APPLICATION for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Goutam Patnaik by OPEX CORPORATION. ( Filing fee $ 40 receipt number APAEDC-15720097.). (HICKOK, ROBERT)
February 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' #3 MOTION TO STAY IS GRANTED. ALL PROCEEDINGS IN THIS ACTION ARE HEREBY STAYED PEDNING FINAL RESOLUTION, INCLUDING ALL APPEALS, OF THE PENDING ITC INVESTIGATION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE BERLE M. SCHILLER ON 2/9/22.2/9/22 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc)
February 9, 2022 Filing 3 MOTION to Stay filed by HC ROBOTICS, INVATA, LLC.Motion to Stay, Memorandum, Certificate of Service, Exhibits 1-3. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum Memorandum in Support of Motion to Stay, Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit Exhibit 3)(Riley, Philip)
December 21, 2021 Summons Issued as to HC ROBOTICS, INVATA, LLC. E-Mailed To: counsel on 12/27/21. (kw, )
December 21, 2021 Filing 2 Disclosure Statement Form pursuant to FRCP 7.1 by OPEX CORPORATION.(HICKOK, ROBERT)
December 21, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against HC ROBOTICS, INVATA, LLC ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number APAEDC-15624013.), filed by OPEX CORPORATION. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Designation Form)(HICKOK, ROBERT)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: OPEX CORPORATION v. INVATA, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: OPEX CORPORATION
Represented By: ROBERT L. HICKOK
Represented By: DAVID J. SHAW
Represented By: GOUTAM PATNAIK
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: INVATA, LLC
Represented By: Philip Andrew Riley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: HC ROBOTICS
Represented By: Philip Andrew Riley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?