NEWMAN v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OFFICE et al
SHANTELL NEWMAN |
ATTORNEY GENERAL OFFICE and FBI OF PHILADELPHIA |
2:2021cv05681 |
December 28, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
MITCHELL S GOLDBERG |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED. COMPLAINT IS DEEMED FILED AS OUTLINED HEREIN. MOTION (DOC. 3) IS DENIED AS MOOT. MOTION FOR RELEASE OF INMATE (DOC. 4) IS DENIED AS MOOT. CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 1/13/22. 1/14/22 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(rf, ) |
Filing 6 MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 1/13/22. 1/14/22 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(rf, ) |
Filing 5 PRO SE NOTICE RE: GUIDELINES (rf, ) |
Filing 4 MOTION FOR RELEASE OF AN INMATE filed by SHANTELL NEWMAN. *NO ENVELOPE ATTACHED*(rf, ) |
Filing 3 MOTION TO DISCLOSE ALL EVIDENCE AND VIDEO filed by SHANTELL NEWMAN. *NO ENVELOPE ATTACHED*(rf, ) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against ATTORNEY GENERAL OFFICE, FBI OF PHILADELPHIA, filed by SHANTELL NEWMAN, EXHIBITS, *IFP PENDING* *NO ENVELOPE ATTACHED* (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(rf, ) |
Filing 1 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS *NO ENVELOPE ATTACHED* filed by SHANTELL NEWMAN..(rf, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.