TAYLOR v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al.
MICHAEL TAYLOR |
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP and MERCK & CO., INC. |
2:2021cv20002 |
February 10, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
HARVEY BARTLE |
P.I.: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by DINO S. SANGIAMO on behalf of MERCK & CO., INC., MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP with Certificate of Service(SANGIAMO, DINO) |
Filing 4 Case transferred in from District of New Jersey; Case Number 2:21-cv-01547. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
![]() |
Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to MERCK & CO., INC., MERCK SHARP & DOHME, CORP.. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (ld, ) [Transferred from New Jersey on 2/11/2021.] |
Judge John Michael Vazquez and Chief Mag. Judge Mark Falk added. (ps) [Transferred from New Jersey on 2/11/2021.] |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MERCK & CO., INC., MERCK SHARP & DOHME, CORP. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-12061358) with JURY DEMAND, filed by MICHAEL TAYLOR. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(GREENWELL, ROBERT). [Transferred from New Jersey on 2/11/2021.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.