SEITZ v. ROTHERMEL et al
| GARY F. SEITZ |
| ANDREW ROTHERMEL, THOMAS GREER, JEFFREY MUIR, TOM LEAHEY and VINCENT OLMSTEAD |
| 2:2021mc00083 |
| November 16, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| WENDY BEETLESTONE |
| Miscellaneous |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Memorandum of Law in Opposition re #1 MOTION to Withdraw filed by GARY F. SEITZ. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(SPIRO, JASON) Modified on 12/16/2021 (tjd). |
Filing 4
STIPULATION AND ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF SHALL HAVE UNTIL DECEMBER 14, 2021 TO FILE ITS OPPOSITION TO THE ROTHERMEL DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF REFERENCE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WENDY BEETLESTONE ON 12/2/21. 12/2/21 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(jaa, )
|
| Filing 3 STIPULATION BY THOMAS GREER, JEFFREY MUIR, VINCENT OLMSTEAD, ANDREW ROTHERMEL AND BETWEEN CITY LINE BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE, LLC. IN RE: MOTION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF REFERENCE. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(jaa, ) |
| Filing 2 STIPULATION BY TOM LEAHEY AND BETWEEN PLAINTIFF IN RE: MOTION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF REFERENCE. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(jaa, ) |
| Filing 1 MOTION OF DEFENDANTS ANDREW ROTHERMEL, THOMAS GREER, JEFFREY MUIR, AND VINCENT OLMSTEAD FOR WITHDRAWAL OF REFERENCE filed by THOMAS GREER, JEFFREY MUIR, VINCENT OLMSTEAD, ANDREW ROTHERMEL.. (Attachments: #1 DOCKET AND MOTION)(bw, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
