BRYANT v. CIGNA CORP. et al
BRYAN BRYANT |
CIGNA CORPORATION, CIGNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK, LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA and CONNECTICUT LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY |
2:2022cv00015 |
January 4, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
C DARNELL JONES |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Copy of Order/Notice dated 1/13/22 (Document # 2) and envelope returned from the U.S. Postal Service addressed to CIGNA CORPORATION for the following reason: ATTEMPTED NOT KNOWN. (amas) |
Filing 9 STIPULATION of Dismissal AS TO CERTAIN DEFENDANTS ONLY by CIGNA CORPORATION, CIGNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK, CONNECTICUT LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY. (STRAUSS, CAITLIN) |
Filing 8 Disclosure Statement Form pursuant to FRCP 7.1 including New York Life Insurance Company with Certificate of Service by LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA.(STRAUSS, CAITLIN) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by CAITLIN P. STRAUSS on behalf of CIGNA CORPORATION, CIGNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK, CONNECTICUT LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA with Certificate of Service(STRAUSS, CAITLIN) |
Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by BRYAN BRYANT. CONNECTICUT LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY waiver sent on 1/5/2022, answer due 3/7/2022. (BOONSWANG, CHAD) |
Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by BRYAN BRYANT. CIGNA CORPORATION waiver sent on 1/5/2022, answer due 3/7/2022. (BOONSWANG, CHAD) |
Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by BRYAN BRYANT. CIGNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK waiver sent on 1/5/2022, answer due 3/7/2022. (BOONSWANG, CHAD) |
Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by BRYAN BRYANT. LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA waiver sent on 1/5/2022, answer due 3/7/2022. (BOONSWANG, CHAD) |
MAILED OUT ORDER ENTRY #2 TO UNREPS ON 1/14/22. (jaa, ) |
Filing 2 ORDER THAT TEN (10) DAYS PRIOR TO ANY MOTION BEING FILED (INCLUDING A MOTION UNDER FRCP 12 OR 56, 28 USC SEC. 1411, 0R 28 USC SEC. 1404), COUNSEL MUST NOTIFY OPPOSING COUNSEL TO DISCUSS THE SUBSTANCE OF THE POTENTIAL MOTION, AND THE POSSIBLE RESOLUTION OF SAME. THESE DISCUSSIONS SHALL BE SUBSTANTIVE AND NOT PERFUNCTORY. TO THIS END, COUNSEL SHALLPROVIDE THE OPPOSING PARTY WITH AN OPPORTUNITY TO CURE ANY ALLEGED DEFECTS PRIOR TO FILING A MOTION, ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE C. DARNELL JONES, II ON 1/13/22. 1/14/22 ENTERED & E-MAILED. NOT MAILED TO UNREPS.(fdc) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CIGNA CORP., CIGNA LIFE INSURANCE CO. OF NORTH AMERICA, CONNECTICUT LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number APAEDC-15639277.), filed by BRYAN BRYANT. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Designation Form Designation Form, #3 Exhibit Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit Exhibit D, #7 Exhibit Exhibit E, #8 Exhibit Exhibit F, #9 Exhibit Exhibit G, #10 Exhibit Exhibit H, #11 Exhibit Exhibit I, #12 Exhibit Exhibit J, #13 Exhibit Exhibit K, #14 Exhibit Exhibit L, #15 Exhibit Exhibit M, #16 Exhibit Exhibit N)(BOONSWANG, CHAD) |
Summons Issued as to CIGNA CORPORATION, CIGNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK, CONNECTICUT LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA. Forwarded To: PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL on 1/4/22 (amas, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.