TEXAS MEDICAL SUPPLY, LLC et al v. LUBIN
| TEXAS MEDICAL SUPPLY, LLC, JAD SHRAIM, OMARI SHAFRAN and DIMITRI MENIN |
| AVRUMI LUBIN |
| 2:2022cv00059 |
| January 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| R BARCLAY SURRICK |
| Other Statutes: Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
| 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER THAT THE APPLICATION OF MATTHEW J. MORRIS, ESQUIRE, TO PRACTICE IN THIS COURT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 83.5.2(b) IS GRANTED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE R. BARCLAY SURRICK ON 3/25/22.3/25/22 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(ti)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER THAT THE APPLICATION OF DAVID A. PICON, ESQUIRE, TO PRACTICE IN THIS COURT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 83.5.2(b) IS GRANTED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE R. BARCLAY SURRICK ON 3/25/22.3/25/22 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(ti)
|
| Filing Fee for PRO HAC VICE by AVRUMI LUBIN. (Filing Fee $40, receipt number APAEDC-15788549). (CHUK, STEPHEN) |
| Filing Fee for PRO HAC VICE by AVRUMI LUBIN. (Filing Fee $40, receipt number APAEDC-15788563). (CHUK, STEPHEN) |
| Filing 10 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by AVRUMI LUBIN.Memorandum, Declaration, Certificate of Service. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Declaration of A. Lubin, #3 Exhibit 1 to Lubin Declaration, #4 Exhibit 2 to Lubin Declaration, #5 Text of Proposed Order)(CHUK, STEPHEN) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice for Matthew J. Morris filed by AVRUMI LUBIN.Certificate of Service.(CHUK, STEPHEN) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice for David A. Picon filed by AVRUMI LUBIN.Certificate of Service.(CHUK, STEPHEN) |
|
Filing 7
STIPULATION AND ORDER THAT THE DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT IN THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED ACTION SHALL BE UP TO AND INCLUDING MARCH 14, 2022. SIGNED BY HONORABLE R. BARCLAY SURRICK ON 3/1/22. 3/1/22 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ti)
|
| Filing 6 STIPULATION - Joint Stipulation to Extend Time to Answer, Move, or Otherwise Respond to the Complaint by AVRUMI LUBIN. (CHUK, STEPHEN) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by STEPHEN R. CHUK on behalf of AVRUMI LUBIN with Certificate of Service (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(CHUK, STEPHEN) |
| Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT of Service by Benito Acevedo, Sr. re: served Summons and Complaint and Exhibits upon Mrs. Lubin wife of Defendant, Avrumi Lubin by Hand Delivery on February 7, 2022 (HESKIN, SHANE) |
| Filing 3 EXHIBIT Civil Cover Sheet by DIMITRI MENIN, OMARI SHAFRAN, JAD SHRAIM, TEXAS MEDICAL SUPPLY, LLC.. (HESKIN, SHANE) |
| Filing 2 EXHIBIT Designation Form by DIMITRI MENIN, OMARI SHAFRAN, JAD SHRAIM, TEXAS MEDICAL SUPPLY, LLC.. (HESKIN, SHANE) |
| Attorneys are required by local rule to complete and file both a Civil Cover Sheet and a Designation Form. PLAINTIFF's counsel is directed to file DESIGNATION FORM in this case using the Exhibit docket event. (sbt) |
| Summons Issued as to AVRUMI LUBIN. Forwarded To: EMAILED TO PLAINTIFFS COUNSEL on 1/10/2022 (sg, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against AVRUMI LUBIN ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number APAEDC-15648598.), filed by TEXAS MEDICAL SUPPLY, LLC, DIMITRI MENIN, OMARI SHAFRAN, JAD SHRAIM. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit Exhibit D)(HESKIN, SHANE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
