FLAMER v. LYNN et al
| JEFFREY JEROME FLAMER |
| LT. LYNN, MUHAMMED and SERGEANT KNIGHT |
| 2:2022cv00080 |
| January 5, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| TIMOTHY J SAVAGE |
| Prisoner Petitions: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MAILED OUT ORDER ENTRY #5 TO PLAINTIFF ON 2/1/22. (jaa, ) |
Filing 5
ORDER THAT PETITIONER'S MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. THE PETITION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS PREMATURE. WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, PETITIONER SHALL EITHER FILE A CERTIFIED COPY OF HIS INMATE ACCOUNT STATEMENT; OR REMIT THE SUM OF $402.00 TO THE CLERK OF COURT. FURTHER INFORMATION OUTLINED HEREIN. SIGNED BY HONORABLE TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE ON 1/28/22.1/31/22 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PRO SE. (amas)
|
| Document #4 mailed to pro se plff. (kw) |
| Filing 4 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (fdc) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by JEFFREY JEROME FLAMER.(fdc) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against KNIGHT, LYNN, MUHAMMED, filed by JEFFREY JEROME FLAMER. (IFP Pending) (fdc) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by JEFFREY JEROME FLAMER..(fdc) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/10/2022: #1 Declaration) (fdc). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
