Akter et al v. Infield et al
| Sharmin Akter and Asif Khan |
| Jon Infield, DRASC, INC., Gordon Milk Transport, Inc., JOHN DOES 1-10 and JOHN DOE CORPORATIONS 1-10 |
| 2:2022cv00162 |
| January 13, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| JOHN R PADOVA |
| P.I.: Motor Vehicle |
| 23 U.S.C. ยง 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
STIPULATION AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANT, GORDON MILK TRANSPORT, INC., IS DISMISSED FROM THIS MATTER WITH PREJUDICE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOHN R. PADOVA ON 2/18/22. 2/18/22 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas)
|
| Filing 4 STIPULATION by DRASC, INC., Gordon Milk Transport, Inc., Jon Infield. (GROSS, LAURENCE) |
| Filing 3 Disclosure Statement Form pursuant to FRCP 7.1 by DRASC, INC., Gordon Milk Transport, Inc..(GROSS, LAURENCE) |
| Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint by DRASC, INC., Gordon Milk Transport, Inc., Jon Infield.(GROSS, LAURENCE) |
| Summons Issued as to DRASC, INC., Gordon Milk Transport, Inc., Jon Infield. Emailed To: Plaintiff's Counsel on 1/14/22. (va, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JOHN DOES 1-10, DRASC, INC., Gordon Milk Transport, Inc., Jon Infield, JOHN DOE CORPORATION 1-10 ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number APAEDC-15662231.), filed by Asif Khan, Sharmin Akter.(GABAY, ELI) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
