MORRIS v. SUPERINTENDENT SCI FRACKVILLE et al
Petitioner: TYREE MORRIS
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT SCI FRACKVILLE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case Number: 2:2022cv00248
Filed: January 19, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: KAREN S MARSTON
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus: (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 17, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE OF ELECTION, FILED BY TYREE MORRIS. (amas)
March 14, 2022 Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number PPE237988 (sbt)
February 15, 2022 MAILED OUT ORDER ENTRY #4 TO PETITIONER ON 2/15/22. (jaa, )
February 14, 2022 Filing 5 MOTION FOR ABEYANCE filed by TYREE MORRIS..(bw)
February 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER THAT THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO FURNISH MORRIS WITH A BLANK COPY OF THIS COURTS CURRENT APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. IF MORRIS SEEKS TO PROCEED WITH THIS CASE HE MUST, WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, EITHER (1) PAY THE REQUIRED $5 FILING FEE TO THE CLERK OF COURT, OR (2) COMPLETE AND RETURN THE APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, INCLUDING THE REQUIRED CERTIFICATION OF PRISON ASSETS SIGNED BY A PRISON OFFICIAL, TO THE CLERK OF COURT. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS DIRECTIVE MAY RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THIS CASE WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. MORRIS IS DIRECTED TO RETURN THE NOTICE OF ELECTION FORM ATTACHED TO THIS ORDER ACKNOWLEDGING THESE INSTRUCTIONS AND INDICATING HIS ELECTION TO HAVE THE PETITION CONSTRUED, AND RULED ON, AS FILED. MORRIS IS DIRECTED TO REVIEW THE WARNINGS SET FORTH ABOVE, WHICH EXPLAIN CERTAIN FEATURES OF THE HABEAS STATUTES, INCLUDING THE RELEVANT STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS. IF MORRIS FAILS TO COMPLETE AND RETURN THE NOTICE OF ELECTION FORM TO THIS COURT WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, THE COURT WILL RULE ON THE CURRENT PETITION, AS FILED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE KAREN S. MARSTON ON 2/14/22. 2/14/22 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PRO SE.(bw)
February 10, 2022 Filing 3 MOTION FOR ABEYANCE filed by TYREE MORRIS..(bw, )
January 21, 2022 COPY OF THE NOTICE OF PRO SE GUIDELINES HAVE BEEN MAILED TO PRO SE, MORRIS. (bw)
January 19, 2022 Filing 2 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (bw)
January 19, 2022 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by TYREE MORRIS. (NO FEE PAID; NO IFP FILED)(bw, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MORRIS v. SUPERINTENDENT SCI FRACKVILLE et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: TYREE MORRIS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT SCI FRACKVILLE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?