BOURSIQUOT v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE et al
| MARIE BOURSIQUOT |
| PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE and JOHN WAIDA |
| 2:2022cv00603 |
| February 16, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| GERALD A MCHUGH |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Joint Rule 26 by both parties by PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE, JOHN WAIDA. (KAPLAN, SARINA) Modified on 4/11/2022 (tjd). |
| Filing 6 NOTICE THAT TO ASSIST THE COURT WITH FUTURE SCHEDULING OF CASE MANAGEMENT DEADLINES, COUNSEL SHALL MEET AND CONFER ON OR BEFORE APRIL 15, 2022, AND PROPOSE DEADLINES TO THE COURT FOR A CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. ATTACHED IS JUDGE MCHUGHS FORM REPORT OF RULE 26(F) MEETING. AFTER CONSULTATION WITH COUNSEL FOR ALL PARTIES, COUNSEL SHALL COMPLETE, FORWARD TO CHAMBERS, AND FILE ON ECF THE REQUIRED REPORT OF THE RULE 26(F) MEETING INCORPORATING ALL THE INFORMATION DESCRIBED IN JUDGE MCHUGHS FORM BY THE DATE PROVIDED ABOVE. THE RULE 26(F) REPORT SHOULD ATTACH CRITICAL DOCUMENTS FOR REVIEW BY THE COURT (E.G., IN A CONTRACT CASE, THE DOCUMENT(S) COMPRISING THE CONTRACT; IN A PERSONAL INJURY CASE, PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE SCENE, ETC.). COUNSEL SHOULD ADDRESS THE ESSENTIAL ISSUES AND FACTS ALONG WITH THE STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES OF THE CASE. AFTER REVIEW OF THE PARTIES REPORT, JUDGE MCHUGH WILL ENTER A CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER OR SCHEDULE A RULE 16 CONFERENCE. (jaa, ) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint by PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE, JOHN WAIDA. Affirmative Defenses.(KAPLAN, SARINA) Modified on 3/10/2022 (tjd). |
| Filing 4 Original Record together with certified copy of docket entries received from Court of Common Pleas of PHILADELPHIA County. (fdc) |
Filing 3
STIPULATION AND ORDER THAT THE TIME FOR COMMONWEALTH DEFENDANTS, PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE AND JOHN WAIDA TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT IS EXTENDED BY TWO WEEKS. THE COMMONWEALTH DEFENDANTS RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT WILL BECOME DUE ON MARCH 9, 2022. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD A. MCHUGH ON 2/17/22. 2/17/22 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(jaa, )
|
| Filing 2 STIPULATION to Extend Time To Answer or Otherwise Reply to Plaintiff's Complaint by PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE, JOHN WAIDA. (KAPLAN, SARINA) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by JOHN WAIDA, PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number APAEDC-15731137), filed by JOHN WAIDA, PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - Plaintiff's PCCP Complaint, # NOTICE OF REMOVAL by JOHN WAIDA, PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number APAEDC-15731137), filed by JOHN WAIDA, PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - Plaintiff's PCCP Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Designation Form Designation Form, #4 Case Management Track Form Case Management Track Form)(KAPLAN, SARINA) (Attachment 2 replaced on 2/17/2022) (sbt). (Attachment 2 replaced on 2/17/2022) (sbt). (At(2) Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Designation Form Designation Form, #4 Case Management Track Form Case Management Track Form)(KAPLAN, SARINA) (Attachment 2 replaced on 2/17/2022) (sbt). (Attachment 2 replaced on 2/17/2022) (sbt). (Attachment 3 replaced on 2/17/2022) (sbt). tachment 3 replaced on 2/17/2022) (sbt). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
