DHINGRA v. SAP AMERICA, INC.
| ANURADHA DHINGRA |
| SAP AMERICA, INC. |
| 2:2022cv00765 |
| March 1, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| CHAD F KENNEY |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER THAT AN ON THE RECORD INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE (RULE 16) IS SET FOR 5/19/22 AT 9:00 AM IN COURTROOM 11B BEFORE HONORABLE CHAD F. KENNEY. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CHAD F. KENNEY ON 4/29/22. 4/29/22 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc)
|
|
Filing 9
ANSWER to #1 Complaint by SAP AMERICA, INC..(HOWARD, CHASE)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER THAT THE COURT'S RECORDS SHOWS THAT A PLEADING HAS NOT BEEN FILED IN THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED ACTION IN RESPONSE TO THE COMPLAINT. IF SUCH A PLEADING IS NOT FILED BY THE ABOVE-NAMED DEFENDANT ON OR BEFORE 4/29/22, YOU MAY FILE A REQUEST WITH THE CLERK FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 55 OF THE FRCP. IF THE REQUEST FOR DEFAULT IS NOT FILED BY 5/6/22, THE COURT MAY ENTER AN ORDER DISMISSING THE CASE AGAINST THE ABOVE-NAMED DEFENDANT FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CHAD F. KENNEY ON 4/5/22. 4/5/22 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc) 4/18/2022 Chambers mailed copy of ECF No. 8 to Mary Beth Hanss, General Counsel, SAP America, Inc., 3999 West Chester Pike, Newtown Square, PA 19073. Modified on 4/18/2022 (sme).
|
|
Filing 7
AFFIDAVIT of Service by Anuradha Dhingra re: served Summons upon Mary Beth Hanss, General Counsel for SAP America, Inc. by Certified Mail on 3/14/22 (Attachments: #1 Email)(fdc)
|
|
Filing 6
AFFIDAVIT of Service by Anuradha Dhingra re: served Summons & Complaint upon SAP America, Inc. by Certified Mail on 3/11/22 (Attachments: #1 Email)(fdc)
|
|
Summons Issued as to SAP AMERICA, INC.. Forwarded To: Dhingra on 3/10/22 (fdc)
|
|
Filing 5
Email Letter dated 3/9/22 by ANURADHA DHINGRA (fdc)
|
|
DOC # 4 AND NON PRISONER IFP SENT TO PRO SE (rf, )
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER THAT, IF DINGHRA SEEKS TO PROCEED WITH THIS CASE, SHE MUST, WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, EITHER (1) PAY $402, OR (2) FILE A MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CHAD F. KENNEY ON 3/7/22. 3/7/22 ENTERED & E-MAILED. (fdc)
|
|
Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number PPE237440 (sbt)
|
|
Filing 3
PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (fdc)
|
|
Filing 2
Request for Injunction by ANURADHA DHINGRA. (Attachments: #1 Email)(fdc)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against SAP AMERICA, INC., filed by ANURADHA DHINGRA. (NO FEE PAID; NO IFP FILED) (Attachments: #1 Email)(fdc)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: DHINGRA v. SAP AMERICA, INC. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: ANURADHA DHINGRA | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: SAP AMERICA, INC. | |
| Represented By: | CHASE A. HOWARD |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
