PURCELL v. GEICO CASUALTY COMPANY
MICHAEL PURCELL, JR. |
GEICO CASUALTY COMPANY |
2:2022cv00825 |
March 4, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
GENE EK PRATTER |
Contract: Insurance |
18 U.S.C. ยง 133 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 REPLY to Response to Motion re #7 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by GEICO CASUALTY COMPANY. (KOCHIS, KYMBERLY) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Hearing: THE INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE IS SET FOR 5/11/2022 AT 9:30 AM IN Chambers BEFORE HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER. (Attachments: #1 Supplement, #2 Supplement, #3 Supplement)(sfl) (Main Document 10 replaced on 4/12/2022) (sfl). |
Filing 9 ORDER RE THE DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE ITS REPLY IN FURTHER SUPPORT OF ITS #7 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM IS EXTEDED TO APRIL 26, 2022. SIGNED BY THE HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 4/7/2022. 4/7/2022 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sfl) |
Filing 8 RESPONSE in Opposition re #7 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by MICHAEL PURCELL, JR. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Text of Proposed Order, #3 Certificate of Service, #4 Exhibit A-E)(HAGGERTY, JAMES) |
Filing 7 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by GEICO CASUALTY COMPANY.Memorandum, Certificate of Service. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Law in Support, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(KOCHIS, KYMBERLY) |
Filing 6 Original Record together with certified copy of docket entries received from Court of Common Pleas of PHILADELPHIA County. (fdc) |
Filing 5 ORDER RE: THE DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT IS EXTENDED TO MARCH 24, 2022. SIGNED BY THE HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 3/9/2022. 3/9/2022 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sfl) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by JAMES C. HAGGERTY on behalf of MICHAEL PURCELL, JR with Certificate of Service (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(HAGGERTY, JAMES) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by JONATHAN SHUB on behalf of MICHAEL PURCELL, JR (SHUB, JONATHAN) |
Filing 2 Disclosure Statement Form pursuant to FRCP 7.1 including GEICO Indemnity Company; GEICO Corporation; Berkshire Hathaway, Inc. with Certificate of Service by GEICO CASUALTY COMPANY.(KOCHIS, KYMBERLY) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by GEICO CASUALTY COMPANY (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number APAEDC-15767014), filed by GEICO CASUALTY COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Pleadings, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Designation Form)(KOCHIS, KYMBERLY) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: PURCELL v. GEICO CASUALTY COMPANY | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: MICHAEL PURCELL, JR. | |
Represented By: | JONATHAN SHUB |
Represented By: | JAMES C. HAGGERTY |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: GEICO CASUALTY COMPANY | |
Represented By: | KYMBERLY KOCHIS |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.