SESAY. v. UNITED STATES MILITARY/ARMY
Plaintiff: NENNEH SESAY
Defendant: UNITED STATES MILITARY/ARMY
Case Number: 2:2022cv00934
Filed: March 7, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: GERALD J PAPPERT
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER THAT SESAY IS GRANTED LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1915 IN CIVIL ACTION NOS. 22-0082, 22-0083, 22-0119, 22-0934, 22-0936, 22-0938, 22-0939, 22-1026, 22-1061, 22-1062, 22-1067, 22-1068, 22-1069, 22-1158, AND 22-1254. THE COMPLAINTS IN CIVIL ACTION NOS. 22-0082, 22-0083, 22-0119, 22-0934, 22-0936, 22-0938, 22-0939, 22-1026, 22-1061, 22-1062, 22-1067, 22-1068, 22-1069, 22-1158, AND 22-1254 ARE DEEMED FILED. THE COMPLAINTS IN CIVIL ACTION NOS. 22-0082, 22-0083, 22-0119, 22-0934, 22-0936, 22-0938, 22-0939, 22-1026, 22-1061, 22-1062, 22-1067, 22-1068, 22-1069, 22-1158, AND 22-1254 ARE DISMISSED FOR THE REASONS DISCUSSED IN THE COURTS MEMORANDUM. SESAY MAY NOT AMEND HER COMPLAINT IN THESE CASES AS AMENDMENT WOULD BE FUTILE. ALL OF SESAYS CLAIMS ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE WITH THE EXCEPTION OF ANY STATE LAW CLAIMS DISMISSED FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION, WHICH ARE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO SESAYS RIGHT TO FILE THESE CLAIMS IN AN APPROPRIATE STATE COURT. SESAYS MOTIONS REQUESTING TO SEE THE JUDGE AND OBTAIN A CASH SETTLEMENT (ECF 4, CIV. A. NO. 22-0934); (ECF 3, CIV. A. NO. 22-0936); (ECF 3, CIV. A. NO. 22-0938); (ECF 3, CIV. A. NO. 22-0939); AND (ECF 3, CIV. A. NO. 22-1254) ARE DENIED AS MOOT. IF SESAY FILES ANY MORE GROUNDLESS COMPLAINTS, THE COURT WILL CONSIDER THE APPROPRIATENESS OF AN INJUNCTION BARRING HER FROM FILING NEW CIVIL ACTIONS ON AN IN FORMA PAUPERIS BASIS IN THE FUTURE. THE COURT CERTIFIES THAT ANY APPEAL FROM THIS ORDER IS NOT TAKEN IN GOOD FAITH. SEE 28 U.S.C. 1915(A)(3); FED. R. APP. P. 24(A)(3)(A). THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO CLOSE THESE CASES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 4/12/22. 4/13/22 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (va) Modified on 4/13/2022 (va).
April 12, 2022 Filing 5 MEMORANDUM SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 4/12/22. 4/13/22 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (va) Modified on 4/13/2022 (va).
March 7, 2022 Filing 4 REQUEST by NENNEH SESAY. (bw)
March 7, 2022 Filing 3 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (bw)
March 7, 2022 Filing 2 COMPLAINT against UNITED STATES MILITARY/ARMY, filed by NENNEH SESAY. *NO ENVELOPE* (bw) Modified on 3/14/2022 (bw). Modified on 3/15/2022 (bw).
March 7, 2022 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by NENNEH SESAY. ..(bw) Modified on 3/14/2022 (bw).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SESAY. v. UNITED STATES MILITARY/ARMY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: NENNEH SESAY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNITED STATES MILITARY/ARMY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?